Teams

HCC - Hill

2023 Alachua Combo 18 & Over · 7.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.43 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-21vs ALACHUA/Crawford/Combo18&Over7.5WWon 10
W#2 DoublesBetsy Severance / Kelsy Hill vs Tara Edelstein / Cristi Dobbs6-4, 6-4
2023-12-13vs JTC - MadorskyWon 10
W#1 DoublesMargot Maurer / Kelsy Hill vs Taiana Mendez / Judith Bertran7-5, 6-2
2023-12-10vs JTC - WoodyLost 01
L#1 DoublesKelsy Hill / Angie Gomez vs Jigisha Shah / Stephanie Ryan3-6, 4-6
2023-11-05vs JTC - WoodyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandra Werbel / Haesuk Park vs Ali Messenger / Jigisha Shah3-6, 1-6
2023-10-29vs JTC - MadorskyLost 02
L#2 DoublesHaesuk Park / Sandra Werbel vs Peggi Bockman / Melissa Morris5-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelsy Hill / Margot Maurer vs Judith Bertran / Taiana Mendez3-6, 2-6
2023-10-22vs ALACHUA/Crawford/Combo18&Over7.5WLost 01
L#2 DoublesJennifer Halinski / Haesuk Park vs Jordan Davis / Cristi Dobbs0-6, 4-6
2023-10-15vs JTC - WoodyWon 10
W#2 DoublesKelsy Hill / Jennifer Halinski vs Amber Muehlmann / Stephanie Ryan7-5, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Mara Rodriguez
published
3.33
Angie Gomez
published 3.5
3.24
Haesuk Park
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.22
Kelsy Hill
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Margot Maurer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Jennifer Halinski
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Jodi Cox
published
3.09
Candis Aurora Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.78
Betsy Severance
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.70
Wanda Cross
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candis Aurora Wiggins + Haesuk Park2350% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mara Rodriguez
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Angie Gomez
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Haesuk Park
86W–64L career · 10 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Kelsy Hill
103W–116L career · 12 lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
Margot Maurer
51W–79L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Jennifer Halinski
61W–70L career · 5 lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
Jodi Cox
6W–17L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Candis Aurora Wiggins
49W–51L career · 3 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Betsy Severance
13W–59L career · 5 lines in 2023
2%92%5%
2.78
Wanda Cross
9W–17L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.