Teams

WRAC-Irawan

2023 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.40 / EASTERN WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-05-21vs EW-WCCP-HergertLost 12
W#1 DoublesFandhi Irawan / Terrence McIver vs Jason Chapman / Michael Khounnala6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Haight / Eldon Monson vs Sean Hergert / Maxwell Mehren1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Carter / Mike Mueller vs Eric Donovan / Duke Dixon0-6, 1-6
2023-05-21vs SRC-PalozzoloSplit 22
W#1 DoublesFandhi Irawan / Terrence McIver vs Tyler van Horn / Justin Wright7-6, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJamie Carter vs Don Ballew1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAl Stonas / David Haight vs Derek Barraclough / Joseph Palozzolo6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesEldon Monson / Mike Mueller vs Clint Taxter / Rob Sanford6-2, 6-2
2023-05-20vs SRC-PalozzoloSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDavid Haight / Eldon Monson vs Tyler van Horn / Justin Wright4-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesTerrence McIver vs Don Ballew3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesFandhi Irawan / Jamie Carter vs Patrick Thomas / Derek Barraclough6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAl Stonas / Mike Mueller vs Clint Taxter / Chris Keltz7-5, 6-1
2023-05-20vs EW-WCCP-HergertLost 04
L#1 DoublesFandhi Irawan / Terrence McIver vs Sean Hergert / Maxwell Mehren4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMike Mueller vs Patrick Vichit0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Haight / Eldon Monson vs Jason Chapman / Jeffery Urie4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesAl Stonas / Jamie Carter vs Curt Andersen / Eric Donovan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1EW-WCCP-Hergert40151693
2WRAC-Irawan1351122166
3SRC-Palozzolo1341225171

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Al Stonas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
David Haight
published 4.5
Eldon Monson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Fandhi Irawan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Jamie Carter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Mike Mueller
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Terrence McIver
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Haight + Eldon Monson4164% games+15.8% vs expected
Terrence McIver + Fandhi Irawan4351% games+0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Al Stonas
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
David Haight
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Eldon Monson
36W–15L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Fandhi Irawan
5W–3L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Jamie Carter
14W–9L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Mueller
6W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terrence McIver
4W–4L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.