Teams

CV-Sun City PD/Kim & McGee

2023 SoCal Doubles - CV · CV Women's 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.83 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-09vs CV-Palm Springs TC/HoffmanLost 02
L#1 DoublesNadine Kim / Grace Baraniak vs Amy Springer / Maureen Jaramillo6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAllyson Marks / Dori Craft vs Doris Hoffmann / Michelle Traeger6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-11-26vs CV-Palm Desert Tennis Club/CannonWon 20
W#2 DoublesAllyson Marks / Elizabeth Dobell vs Sue Cannon / Merrie Vieco6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLori Greenman / Nadine Kim vs Deborah Orange / Mary Kern6-2, 6-3
L#1 DoublesNadine Kim / Lori Greenman vs Pamela Milroy / Cynthia Reyes1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Dobell / Allyson Marks vs Martha Church / Carrie Morton7-5, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCathy Evangelist / Grace Baraniak vs Cheryl Capriola / Susan Potter1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-11-18vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/KouwabunpatLost 02
L#1 DoublesNadine Kim / Barbara Bowles vs Mary Monahan / Judi Marchand1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Baraniak / COLLEEN Jarrar vs Jennifer Finnell / Lisa Symmonds4-6, 4-6
2023-11-11vs CV-Palm Desert Tennis Club/CannonLost 02
L#1 DoublesGrace Baraniak / Cathy Evangelist vs Mistie Iseman / Pamela Schurman5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Dobell / Allyson Marks vs Sue Cannon / Carole Myser4-6, 7-5, 0-1
2023-11-04vs CV-Palm Springs TC/HoffmanSplit 11
L#1 DoublesManuela Andrews / Nadine Kim vs Celeste Armitage / Janice Campbell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Crampton / Allyson Marks vs Janie Erickson / Doris Hoffmann6-1, 6-4
2023-10-14vs LLW-CV-Indian Wells TG/KouwabunpatLost 01
L#3 DoublesGrace Baraniak / Ann Crampton vs Lisa Symmonds / Lorna Matthew2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Lori Greenman
published
Catherine Lind
published 4
3.71
Cathy Evangelist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Bozena Barris
published 4
3.64
Allyson Marks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Grace Baraniak
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.35
Nadine Kim
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.30
COLLEEN Jarrar
published 3.5
3.28
Lesley Gagnon
published
3.16
Ann Crampton
published 3.5
Dori Craft
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michele Mcgee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nadine Kim + Lesley Gagnon13457% games−6.4% vs expected
Grace Baraniak + Dori Craft134 matchesnot enough data
Grace Baraniak + Nadine Kim123 matchesnot enough data
Nadine Kim + Allyson Marks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lori Greenman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Catherine Lind
2W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Cathy Evangelist
103W–91L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Bozena Barris
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Allyson Marks
60W–80L career · 5 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
Grace Baraniak
61W–55L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%32%68%
3.56
Nadine Kim
90W–96L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
COLLEEN Jarrar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Lesley Gagnon
17W–17L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.28
3.5
Ann Crampton
51W–35L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Dori Craft
18W–23L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Michele Mcgee
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.