Teams

Salisbury Cacciotti

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-25vs Raintree StahlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Valerie Caldwell / Lisa Penny5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2021-06-23vs Kanawha Piepgrass / WaltonLost 02
L#1 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Sarah Boyd vs Sarah Dickinson / Katy Hottinger6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Karen Riley vs Wendy Daniel / Carin Krawitz6-7, 6-7
2021-06-18vs RCC GnappWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Karen Riley vs Diana Dull / Sheri Carlyle6-2, 6-0
2021-06-09vs ACAC DoblerLost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Cheryl Cacciotti vs Elisebeth Gelardi / Carole Camden4-6, 2-6
2021-06-02vs Westwood Hause 3.5Lost 02
L#2 DoublesJulie Kearfott / Ja Kwon vs Rose Yuen / Lil Racelis6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCheryl Cacciotti / Stacey Piotrowski vs Holley Nilson / Julie Farney6-7, 4-6
2021-05-26vs Burkwood JohnsonWon 10
W#1 DoublesKerry Pellicane / Julie Kearfott vs Tricia Jones / Lynne Moore3-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Sara Manners
published
3.60
Kendall Consolvo
published
3.33
Julie Kearfott
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Parker Coon
published
3.19
Kerry Pellicane
published
3.06
Jessica Steinour
published
3.05
Cheryl Cacciotti
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.04
Stacey Piotrowski
published
2.98
Ja Kwon
published 3.5
Tara Hudson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kendall Consolvo + Parker Coon0733% games−5.8% vs expected
Cheryl Cacciotti + Julie Kearfott5651% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sara Manners
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.71
Kendall Consolvo
2W–11L career · no lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
3.5
Julie Kearfott
146W–104L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%90%10%
3.33
Parker Coon
2W–9L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
3.27
Kerry Pellicane
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
3.19
Jessica Steinour
2W–6L career · no lines in 2021
32%68%<1%
3.06
3
Cheryl Cacciotti
67W–85L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%35%65%
3.05
Stacey Piotrowski
10W–11L career · no lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Ja Kwon
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2021
56%44%<1%
2.98
Tara Hudson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.