Teams

1-MMacdonald-HS-6.0 M

2022 Eno River Mixed 55 & Over · 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening

12 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-11vs 2-SROCHKIND-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesVan Blalock / Terrie Blalock vs Hayes Hofler / Barbara Wilhelm3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Dori Liller vs Barry Nakell / Amy Peters7-5, 6-1
2022-07-11vs 2-SROCHKIND-EnoWon 30
W#1 DoublesVan Blalock / Linda Nagelhout vs Richard Jaskot / Gerri McGuire6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesScott Hartman / Dori Liller vs Hayes Hofler / Amy Peters6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Millicent Snow vs Jacquelyn Bartlett / Kyle Jackson6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2022-06-27vs 2-SROCHKIND-EnoWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Stefan / Linda Nagelhout vs Edgar Rodriguez / Gerri McGuire6-0, 6-3
2022-06-20vs 2-SROCHKIND-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesMichael Liller / Dori Liller vs Kimberly Roberts / Kyle Jackson6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Mary Macdonald vs Hayes Hofler / Amy Peters6-4, 6-2
2022-06-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesScott Hartman / Millicent Snow vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-06-06vs 2-SROCHKIND-EnoWon 20
W#2 DoublesMark Macdonald / Linda Nagelhout vs Richard Jaskot / Leslie Jackson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Millicent Snow vs Amy Peters / Hayes Hofler7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over Adult Mixed 6.0 Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Millicent Snow
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Scott Hartman
published
3.06
David Stefan
published 3.5
3.04
Mark Macdonald
published
2.90
Tracy Stefan
published
2.85
Mary Macdonald
published
2.82
2.66
Linda Nagelhout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.63
Van Blalock
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.62
David Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Kristen Bradfield
published
2.55
Dori Liller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Nagelhout + David Nagelhout134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Nagelhout + Van Blalock224 matchesnot enough data
Dori Liller + David Nagelhout213 matchesnot enough data
Dori Liller + Van Blalock213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Millicent Snow
68W–58L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.29
Scott Hartman
6W–12L career · no lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
David Stefan
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Mark Macdonald
8W–9L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
3.04
Tracy Stefan
25W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Mary Macdonald
25W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
2.85
3
Darrell Bradfield
7W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
2.82
3
Linda Nagelhout
45W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
2.5
Van Blalock
20W–22L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%16%84%
2.63
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Kristen Bradfield
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
32%68%<1%
2.56
3
Dori Liller
104W–101L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.