Teams

La.Daigle18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-09vs St.Bradley18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Holly Eaddy6-3, 6-3
L#3 SinglesRobin Wascher vs Emily Palanzo3-6, 3-6
2025-07-30vs Sa.Fitzpatrick18SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Jennifer Guy6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Sara Fitzpatrick6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesRobin Wascher vs Amanda Meyer2-6, 1-6
2025-07-23vs Na.Rodriguez18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Natalie Rodriguez6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesRobin Wascher vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-07-12vs Ke.O'Rourke18SLost 02
L#1 SinglesSandra Truitt vs Clare Mayo4-6, 2-6
L#3 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Terri Bartucca1-6, 1-6
2025-07-02vs Sa.Highsmith18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesRobin Wascher vs Kristen Patch0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Claire Duff2-6, 3-6
2025-06-18vs De.Farmer18S3.0Won 10
W#3 SinglesRobin Wascher vs Brandi Washington5-7, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-11vs St.Gupton18SLost 02
L#2 SinglesRobin Wascher vs Sydnor Coffman1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesLauren Hiller vs Kristin Baddour7-5, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Sandra Truitt
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.89
Rachel Roberson
published
2.83
Lauren Daigle
published
2.79
Lauren Hiller
usually #3 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.63
2.54
Sarah Cooke
published
2.44
Robin Wascher
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Hiller + Robin Wascher2843% games−7.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sandra Truitt
37W–75L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%34%66%
3.06
Rachel Roberson
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lauren Daigle
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Lauren Hiller
33W–44L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Charlotte Russell
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Sarah Cooke
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Robin Wascher
39W–75L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%66%34%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.