Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2025 Collier Adult 55 & Over ESL Fall · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-12-02vs COLLIER/Werchek/55&Over8.0WSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJanice Forner / Angela Springer vs Nancy Harbert / Veronica Howell3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusanne Navarro / Lori Caple vs Bernadette Devoe / Margaret Werchek6-3, 6-2
2024-11-18vs Heritage Bay - L. KeillorLost 01
L#3 DoublesLori Caple / Angela Springer vs Nancy Krueger / Gina Garfunkel6-7, 3-6
2024-11-04vs Naples Reserve- HugginsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAngela Springer / Lori Caple vs Lori Irvin Hawes / Peggy Stefanac4-6, 4-6
2024-10-29vs Vineyards - KennaughLost 01
L#3 DoublesJanice Forner / Angela Springer vs Debra Bowenkamp / Emily Buckman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2024-10-21vs Island Country Club - MillerLost 01
L#2 DoublesMichelle Maggal / Lori Caple vs Missy Kuklenski / Suzanne Messere6-2, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Kristen Catino
published
3.67
Lori Caple
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Angela Springer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.39
Gretchen Landolt
published
3.36
Susanne Navarro
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.32
Michelle Maggal
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Janice Forner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angela Springer + Lori Caple2846% gamesnot enough data
Angela Springer + Susanne Navarro5454% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Maggal + Lori Caple5448% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Michelle Maggal + Susanne Navarro5257% gamesnot enough data
Angela Springer + Michelle Maggal224 matchesnot enough data
Kristen Catino + Gretchen Landolt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristen Catino
23W–21L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 4 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Angela Springer
88W–87L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Gretchen Landolt
11W–24L career · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Michelle Maggal
169W–159L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Janice Forner
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.