Teams

CORTA/Nishant de Quadros

2026 CORTA USTA Adult 40 & Over - Spring · Men 4.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.86 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-29vs Williamson-CCWon 31
W#1 DoublesNishant de Quadros / Jeremy Morris vs John Morris / Adrian Rudik6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesGregg Jackson / Keith Trawick vs Akshay Bothra / Clifford Simmons6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMark Hudson / Anderson Philips vs Matt Edmonson / Robert Sanchez4-6, 1-6
W#4 DoublesOscar Vasquez / Brad Waddell vs Kerry Philip Baker / David Williams7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2026-03-24vs Graham-CCWon 41
W#1 DoublesMark Sexton / Michael Stewart vs Paul Graham / James Dorchak6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesNishant de Quadros vs Brad Brooks6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMark Hudson / Steve Swords vs Kem Hutchinson / Ken McCoskey4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesJohn Paul Divers / Keith Trawick vs Jeff Arrington / Chip Griffin3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#4 DoublesRourke Stay / Neil Desai vs Ramon Scott / Mark Smith7-5, 6-4
2026-03-17vs Jung-CCWon 31
W#1 DoublesSteve Swords / Mark Sexton vs Trey Brooks / L Scott Laymon6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJeremy Morris / Anderson Philips vs Doug Gibson / Ashish Pingale6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJohn Paul Divers / Rourke Stay vs Mike Chancey / Alap Shah6-0, 6-2
W#4 DoublesCanyon Bowie / Neil Desai vs Min Chul So / Ki Sung6-4, 6-4
2026-03-08vs Williamson-CCWon 31
W#1 DoublesJohn Paul Divers / Jeremy Morris vs Akshay Bothra / Ross White7-5, 6-3
W#1 SinglesKeith Trawick vs Adrian Rudik3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGlenn Davis / Mark Sexton vs Robert Sanchez / David Barrett6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrad Waddell / Oscar Vasquez vs Matt Edmonson / Derick Wolf3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Graham-CCLost 13
W#1 DoublesGregg Jackson / John Paul Divers vs Ramon Scott / Ken McCoskey6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCanyon Bowie vs Brad Brooks2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesNishant de Quadros / Jeremy Morris vs Ronald Beck / Jeff Arrington3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#4 DoublesMark Hudson / Todd Lee vs Brian Anderson / Kem Hutchinson4-6, 3-6
2026-02-22vs Jung-CCWon 32
L#1 DoublesMichael Stewart / Keith Trawick vs Trey Brooks / Mike Chancey2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNishant de Quadros vs Byungsoo Ko0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJeremy Morris / John Paul Divers vs Max Patrick / Min Chul So6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesGregg Jackson / Daryl Ellis vs Ki Sung / Doug Gibson6-4, 6-4
W#4 DoublesMark Hudson / Anderson Philips vs Alap Shah / L Scott Laymon6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-02-14vs Jung-CCWon 31
W#1 DoublesKeith Trawick / Jeremy Morris vs Mike Chancey / Ashish Pingale6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Bruder / Steve Swords vs Alap Shah / Trey Brooks6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMark Sexton / Gregg Jackson vs Sungwoo Jung / Max Patrick5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#4 DoublesCanyon Bowie / Cory Cooper vs Ki Sung / Doug Gibson7-6, 6-4
2026-02-10vs Williamson-CCWon 31
W#1 DoublesNishant de Quadros / Nathan Gehman vs Kerry Philip Baker / Matt Edmonson6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesTan Pham vs Robert Knight3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMark Sexton / Michael Stewart vs Akshay Bothra / Ross White6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesOscar Vasquez / Rourke Stay vs David Barrett / Robert Sanchez6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2026-02-08vs Graham-CCWon 41
W#1 DoublesNishant de Quadros / John Paul Divers vs Ramon Scott / Kem Hutchinson6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTan Pham vs Brad Brooks6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMichael Bruder / Todd Lee vs Antonio Hamilton / Paul Graham6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKeith Trawick / Oscar Vasquez vs Jeff Arrington / Alan Udy6-1, 7-6
W#4 DoublesRourke Stay / Neil Desai vs Scott Douthit / James Dorchak7-6, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CORTA/Nishant de Quadros81321335330
2Graham-CC63242147379

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
John Paul Divers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.87
David Burke
published 4
3.83
Mark Sexton
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.83
Nathan Gehman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Rourke Stay
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.82
Nishant de Quadros
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.79
Canyon Bowie
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.76
Gregg Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Steve Swords
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.72
Keith Trawick
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Todd Lee
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.71
Brad Waddell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.70
Cory Cooper
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Michael Bruder
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Oscar Vasquez
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
3.58
Neil Desai
usually #4 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Tan Pham
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.22
Daryl Ellis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Anderson Philips
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Neil Desai + Rourke Stay6060% games+7.8% vs expected
Nishant de Quadros + John Paul Divers4450% games−3.8% vs expected
Nathan Gehman + John Paul Divers314 matchesnot enough data
Gregg Jackson + Keith Trawick314 matchesnot enough data
Canyon Bowie + Neil Desai303 matchesnot enough data
Cory Cooper + Keith Trawick303 matchesnot enough data
Gregg Jackson + Neil Desai213 matchesnot enough data
Tan Pham + Neil Desai213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

John Paul Divers
91W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.92
4
David Burke
35W–6L career · no lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.87
Mark Sexton
20W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Nathan Gehman
30W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Rourke Stay
22W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.83
Nishant de Quadros
50W–41L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Canyon Bowie
27W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Gregg Jackson
47W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.76
Steve Swords
41W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Keith Trawick
42W–12L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%94%2%
3.72
Todd Lee
28W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Brad Waddell
6W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Cory Cooper
17W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
Michael Bruder
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.65
Oscar Vasquez
25W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%13%87%
3.65
Neil Desai
82W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
Tan Pham
24W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Daryl Ellis
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
5%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Anderson Philips
11W–20L career · type A · 8 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.