Teams

Hasling/40s/3.5/FAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.38 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Cov Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.00 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Damon Morise
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.16
Amanda McInnis
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Bill Bass
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
2.62
Adam Scarbrough
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 28% · published 3
Eric Stegen
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
Gail Miller
usually #3 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
James Tickner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Kenny Wollfarth
usually #1 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 47% · published
Leslie Broussard
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Linda Goudeau
usually #1 Doubles 61%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Liza Ledet DiTommaso
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Randy Hasling
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
Suzanne Allison
usually #1 Doubles 58%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Wendy Morise
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Goudeau + Suzanne Allison5358% gamesnot enough data
Damon Morise + Wendy Morise3448% gamesnot enough data
Adam Scarbrough + Leslie Broussard0641% gamesnot enough data
James Tickner + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Bill Bass + Kenny Wollfarth134 matchesnot enough data
Linda Goudeau + Kenny Wollfarth224 matchesnot enough data
Linda Goudeau + Randy Hasling134 matchesnot enough data
Eric Stegen + Suzanne Allison213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Damon Morise
5W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Amanda McInnis
18W–7L career · 12 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Bill Bass
15W–20L career · 20 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.08
3
Adam Scarbrough
11W–29L career · 25 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.62
Eric Stegen
7W–10L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Gail Miller
24W–34L career · 22 lines in 2026
not enough data
James Tickner
16W–23L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kenny Wollfarth
16W–22L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leslie Broussard
11W–18L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Goudeau
24W–21L career · 28 lines in 2026
not enough data
Liza Ledet DiTommaso
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Randy Hasling
10W–22L career · 18 lines in 2026
not enough data
Suzanne Allison
27W–12L career · 24 lines in 2026
not enough data
Wendy Morise
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.