Teams

KTC Lin

2025 OH OV WINTER A18&O · 2025 Winter A18&O 4.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 4.30 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-26vs STC ClendenenWon 40
W#1 DoublesRichard Heilman / Andrew Linden vs Zach Clendenen / Nathan Lucas6-2, 6-4
W#1 SinglesJeffrey Crace vs Nathan Hart6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Ehlers / Wilbur Lin vs Chad Arnett / Isaac Anderson6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesDrew Barzman vs Jonathan Scherquist6-4, 7-5
2025-02-01vs STC ClendenenLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Linden / John Pinard vs Brian Grant / Jonathan Scherquist1-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesJeffrey Crace vs Nathan Hart1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDavid Ehlers / Richard Heilman vs Zach Clendenen / Nathan Lucas3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2025 Winter A18&O 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.16 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Andrew Linden
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.30
Drew Barzman
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.27
Wilbur Lin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Jeffrey Crace
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.15
Bradley Tash
published 4.5
4.14
Alexander Kang
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
David Ehlers
published 4
3.74
Chris Schlater
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
James Bosse
published
John Pinard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nathan Randall
published
Richard Heilman
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Tash + Wilbur Lin404 matchesnot enough data
John Pinard + Andrew Linden224 matchesnot enough data
John Pinard + Wilbur Lin314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Linden + Wilbur Lin404 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Linden + Richard Heilman224 matchesnot enough data
John Pinard + James Bosse303 matchesnot enough data
Chris Schlater + Richard Heilman033 matchesnot enough data
Wilbur Lin + James Bosse213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Andrew Linden
37W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Drew Barzman
24W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%8%
4.30
Wilbur Lin
44W–25L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
4.27
Jeffrey Crace
13W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Bradley Tash
27W–6L career · no lines in 2025
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Alexander Kang
22W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%84%1%
4.14
4
David Ehlers
24W–29L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Chris Schlater
74W–26L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
James Bosse
29W–27L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Pinard
32W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Nathan Randall
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Richard Heilman
43W–64L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.