Teams

MARIN TC 40MX7.0A

2024 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX7.0

24 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
3.68
Jason Holmes
published
3.68
Michael Graziano
published
3.62
Tassos Papadimos
published
3.50
Elliott Magnuson
published
3.48
Steve Juliani
published
3.42
Marlies Zeisler
published
3.39
Jeff Loebbaka
published
3.34
Derek Boorse
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.33
Helen Luttemo
published
3.31
David Shepard
published 3.5
3.30
Karen Loebbaka
published
3.25
Mark Clem
published
3.21
Katie Magnuson
published
3.19
Babak Jamasbi
published 3.5
3.18
Stacy Nimmo
published
3.13
Jamie Papadimos
published
3.11
Molie Malone
published
3.10
Andrew Fremier
published 3.5
2.95
Tina Mena
published
2.92
Sarah Blevins
published
Carla Willey
published 3
Luba Shveyd
published
Suzanne Kawahara
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Derek Boorse + Sarah Blevins3260% gamesnot enough data
Karen Loebbaka + Steve Juliani224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
3.87
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Michael Graziano
21W–8L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Tassos Papadimos
12W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.62
Elliott Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Steve Juliani
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
3.48
Marlies Zeisler
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.42
Jeff Loebbaka
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
3.39
4
Derek Boorse
137W–176L career · 6 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.34
Helen Luttemo
6W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
David Shepard
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Karen Loebbaka
13W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.30
Mark Clem
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Katie Magnuson
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
3.5
Babak Jamasbi
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.19
Stacy Nimmo
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Jamie Papadimos
8W–12L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.13
Molie Malone
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.11
3.5
Andrew Fremier
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.10
Tina Mena
17W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
2.95
Sarah Blevins
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Carla Willey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Luba Shveyd
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanne Kawahara
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.