Teams

ACAC Harrison

2021 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-06-24vs TDC SteinerWon 10
W#2 SinglesDina Weddle vs Nicole Tritaik6-1, 6-1
2021-06-10vs CCV Call / TriceLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Coleman / Jane Parrish vs Charlotte Clarkson / Lane Mosby2-6, 6-7
2021-05-27vs TCRC SteppWon 10
W#1 DoublesNancy Price / Elizabeth Coleman vs Elizabeth Roetger / C Suzanne Finley7-5, 7-5
2021-05-24vs Salisbury GrayWon 10
W#2 SinglesDina Weddle vs Betsy Gibson6-0, 6-0
2021-05-17vs RCC WozniakWon 20
W#2 DoublesJane Parrish / Elizabeth Coleman vs Susan Lionberger / Rebecca Maguire6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDina Weddle vs Amy Wozniak6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Weekday Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Nancy Price
published
3.51
Dina Weddle
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4
3.21
Elizabeth Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Patti Bryan
published
2.78
Susan Winckler
published
2.77
Pamela Blackburn
published
2.76
LOUISA HARRISON
published
2.75
Jane Parrish
published
2.74
Heather Montague
published 3
2.68
Kristin Gray
published
2.66
Teresa McClellan
published
2.66
Jackie Granger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Blackburn + Jackie Granger224 matchesnot enough data
Susan Winckler + Pamela Blackburn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nancy Price
7W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%1%99%
3.82
4
Dina Weddle
148W–61L career · 3 lines in 2021
48%52%<1%
3.51
3.5
Elizabeth Coleman
172W–119L career · 7 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
Patti Bryan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
2.99
Susan Winckler
10W–19L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
2.78
Pamela Blackburn
28W–34L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
2.77
LOUISA HARRISON
15W–17L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Jane Parrish
7W–13L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.75
3
Heather Montague
15W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Kristin Gray
5W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
2.68
Teresa McClellan
4W–7L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
2.66
3
Jackie Granger
20W–14L career · no lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.