Teams

LA - JBees

2022 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-10vs LA - Downtown AcesLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessie Yuan / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Carolyn Kangavari / Meredith Levine6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesEster Kim / Julia Igel vs Linda Gase / Sara Sherman3-6, 2-6
2022-12-03vs LA-LLW-Dare Doubles-Karen ChouLost 02
L#2 DoublesJessie Yuan / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Janina Morrison / Kara Smith4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEster Kim / Julia Igel vs Karen Chou / Devin O'Fallon1-6, 0-6
2022-12-03vs LA - Sure ShotsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesElaine Low / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Romi Worst / Karie Lanterman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulia Igel / Jessie Yuan vs Sharon Alston / Katherine Rice5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-11-19vs LA - Shadow's AcesLost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Barragar / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Mia Babilonia / Ashley Louie4-6, 6-7
2022-11-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesElaine Low / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Christy Dimitriades / Joanne Vesta7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-10-22vs LA - Tightly StrungSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSarena Ahmad / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Heidi Cotton / Teresa Throenle-Somaini6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulia Igel / Lauren Wrenn vs Crystal Alexander / Christine Kim4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-10-16vs LA - Queen AnneLost 02
L#2 DoublesSarena Ahmad / Julia Igel vs Eriana Blankinship / Halle Mariner1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLauren Wrenn / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Lisa Yu / Joann Davis2-6, 1-6
2022-10-08vs LA - You Got ServedSplit 11
L#1 DoublesChristina Barragar / Julia Igel vs Kate Corry-Saavedra / Danea Lyons4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesEster Kim / Sheba ZamanZadeh vs Kimara Davis / Amy Wolfberg6-1, 6-4
2022-10-02vs LA - MountainGate 1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSheba ZamanZadeh / Maria Castro vs Casondra Ruga / Kim Bajaj1-6, 2-6
2022-09-25vs LA - Volley GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulia Igel / Jessie Yuan vs Andrea Shintani / Anne Nguyen3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Sheba ZamanZadeh
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.01
2.85
Elaine Low
published 3
2.84
Judith Ortiz
published
2.80
Julia Igel
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.57
Ada Ramirez
published 2.5
Sarena Ahmad
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Sheba ZamanZadeh
76W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.12
3
Christina Barragar
10W–1L career · no lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Elaine Low
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
2.85
Judith Ortiz
14W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Julia Igel
50W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
2.5
Ada Ramirez
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
0%29%71%
2.57
Sarena Ahmad
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.