Teams

55 & Over W8.0 - Charo Perez

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#2 DoublesRosario Perez / Irma Nevarez vs Lourdes Figueras / Lillian Nieves6-3, 6-3
2022-03-11vs 55 & Over W8.0 - Dulce CruzWon 10
W#3 DoublesAliana Diaz-Halais / Irma Nevarez vs Carmen Echavarria / Elsa Lopez7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRosario Perez / Irma Nevarez vs Maria Esther Calvo / Sara Velazquez5-7, 5-7
L#3 DoublesIrma Nevarez / Carmen Espada vs Rebeca Carrion / Lourdes Figueras4-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesRebeca Lopez / Irma Nevarez vs Evelyn Mathieu / Vanessa Perez6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesIrma Nevarez / Rosario Perez vs Ana Andino Arellano / Lourdes Feliciano-Nieves4-6, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Anita Rivera
published 4
3.82
Victoria Perez
published
3.62
3.60
Irma Nevarez
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Rosario Perez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Milagros Martir
usually #1 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
3.13
Carmen Espada
published 3.5
3.09
Maria Rivera
published
Marcelle Shub
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
Rebeca Lopez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosario Perez + Anita Rivera6455% games+8.9% vs expected
Irma Nevarez + Maria Rivera6164% games+4.9% vs expected
Irma Nevarez + Rosario Perez5166% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anita Rivera
26W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2022
<1%11%89%
4.16
Victoria Perez
32W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Aliana Diaz-Halais
3W–9L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Irma Nevarez
63W–43L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%23%77%
3.60
3.5
Rosario Perez
70W–55L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
Milagros Martir
72W–44L career · 11 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Carmen Espada
12W–19L career · no lines in 2022
16%83%<1%
3.13
Maria Rivera
43W–17L career · no lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
3.09
Marcelle Shub
14W–17L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebeca Lopez
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Wachie Rivera-Santiago
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.