Teams

PDavis2-ENO

2025 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-06-27vs EPatulski-ENOLost 01
L#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Kelly Swisher3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-06-26Won 10
W#3 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Sarah Johnson6-0, 6-0
2025-06-20vs CFong-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Colleen Starns6-4, 6-1
2025-06-20vs JSpencer-ENOWon 20
W#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Kylie Herst6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesLindsey McIver vs Yemi Runsewe6-0, 6-0
2025-06-06vs JCollins-SVCLost 01
L#1 SinglesPamela Howell-Davis vs Elischa Dessalines0-6, 2-6
2025-06-06vs EPatulski-ENOSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Kristi Brubaker6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Emily Patulski7-6, 7-5
2025-06-02vs PDavis-ENOLost 01
L#2 SinglesLindsey McIver vs Patsy Park4-6, 1-6
2025-05-23vs CFong-ENOWon 10
W#2 SinglesLindsey McIver vs Sybil Pye6-0, 6-0
2025-05-16vs JCollins-SVCLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarin von Kahr vs Latoya Clay1-6, 1-6
2025-05-09vs MPruette-CCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLindsey McIver vs Allison Oshea6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Nicole Helmke6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Lindsey McIver
usually #3 Singles 56%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
2.71
Carin von Kahr
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.54
Pamela Howell-Davis
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 2.5
2.35
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Pamela Howell-Davis + Carin von Kahr4157% gamesnot enough data
Carin von Kahr + Susanne Schmal303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lindsey McIver
44W–36L career · type A · 9 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Carin von Kahr
43W–63L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Pamela Howell-Davis
119W–146L career · 2 lines in 2025
38%61%<1%
2.54
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%43%57%
2.53
2.5
Courtney Van Houtven
3W–7L career · type S · no lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.