Teams

LAGUNA CREEK 55AW7.0A

2025 ADULT 55&Over · Women 7.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-04-28vs RIDGE RC 55AW7.0AWon 21
W#1 DoublesGina Fong / Heather Craig vs Jan Borgman / Terri Johannsen6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSharon Pelfrey / Laura Phillips vs Lynn Doyle / Helen Hansen6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMarty Twitchell / Chris Feusahrens vs Shira Goodnight / Bonnie Goodnight5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Cecelia Henry
published 4
3.58
Cynthia Corral
published 3.5
3.47
Sharon Pelfrey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Karen Cesar
published
3.36
Heather Craig
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
3.13
Ann Harvie
published 3.5
3.10
Leesa Linn
published
2.92
Lori Ottinger
published
2.87
Chris Feusahrens
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Gina Fong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marty Twitchell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michelle Christensen + Cynthia Corral3356% games+6.4% vs expected
Leesa Linn + Heather Craig5450% games−3.8% vs expected
Lori Ottinger + Cecelia Henry224 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Christensen + Leesa Linn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cecelia Henry
9W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Cynthia Corral
28W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Sharon Pelfrey
8W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.47
Karen Cesar
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.39
Heather Craig
16W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
Michelle Christensen
12W–23L career · no lines in 2025
9%89%1%
3.19
3.5
Ann Harvie
1W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
Leesa Linn
17W–18L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lori Ottinger
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3.5
Chris Feusahrens
1W–8L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.87
Gina Fong
1W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Marty Twitchell
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.