Teams

SL Tennis-Vogel/Pierce

2026 Fall Outdoor League-Saturday · 3.0W

16 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings11 teams · 3.0W
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Park City Mid Court Crises000000
2Liberty Park-Kesler000000
3SunPro Queen Bees000000
4Cottonwood Club-Barber/Ricker000000
5Wasatch Hills-Volley Llamas000000
6SL Tennis - Bayna/Bickmore000000
7SM- Tennisaurus-DeLong000000
8Court Smashers000000
9TAOU-Tanner/Coleman000000
10SL Tennis-Vogel/Pierce000000
11IR- Saturday Strikers000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.88
Charlene Case
published 3
2.88
Nancy Matz
published 3
2.83
Mckenna Kimball
published 3
2.79
Kassidy Oasay
published 2.5
2.78
Kelly Singer
published
2.75
Keerstin Smith
published
2.73
Cari Johnson
published 3
2.66
Diana Vogel
published 3
2.63
Valerie Burstein
published
2.61
Megan Pierce
published
2.59
Andy Andersen
published 3
2.49
Staci Dansie
published 3
2.45
Lexi Guild
published
2.42
Pat Williams
published
2.41
Kendall Aguilar
published 3
2.26
Stephanie Favila
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kassidy Oasay + Keerstin Smith12075% games+19.0% vs expected
Mckenna Kimball + Megan Pierce12364% games+17.0% vs expected
Diana Vogel + Kelly Singer131154% games+5.5% vs expected
Stephanie Favila + Staci Dansie2440% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Matz + Diana Vogel1444% gamesnot enough data
Pat Williams + Staci Dansie134 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Matz + Cari Johnson033 matchesnot enough data
Mckenna Kimball + Valerie Burstein213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Charlene Case
8W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.88
3
Nancy Matz
48W–72L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.88
3
Mckenna Kimball
27W–9L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
2.5
Kassidy Oasay
37W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.79
Kelly Singer
34W–50L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
2.78
Keerstin Smith
19W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.75
3
Cari Johnson
42W–75L career · no lines in 2026
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Diana Vogel
52W–77L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
Valerie Burstein
14W–18L career · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
2.63
Megan Pierce
22W–20L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.61
3
Andy Andersen
12W–47L career · no lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
Staci Dansie
50W–155L career · no lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49
Lexi Guild
9W–11L career · no lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.45
Pat Williams
20W–31L career · no lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
3
Kendall Aguilar
46W–41L career · no lines in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Stephanie Favila
47W–119L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.