Teams

Loving/Davis - Hollytree

2025 NETX Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-03-16vs Huskey -FaulknerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa McCrary / Dayna Mayer vs Kimberly Henry / Teresa Jasinski5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLianne Sanchez / Angie Russell vs Joyce Mallory / Deedee Keener3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDeesa Loving / Susan Davis vs Kelly Michaels / Connie McMillin6-4, 6-2
2025-03-09vs Nunez - FaulknerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeesa Loving / Lisa McCrary vs Christina Nunez / Snizhana Zhdanova7-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnn Skogerboe / Dayna Mayer vs Lisa Losack / Margaret Leitner6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Davis / Melissa Barrett vs Laurie Billings / Sherry Willis2-6, 2-6
2025-03-02vs Green -FaulknerWon 21
W#1 DoublesDeesa Loving / Lisa McCrary vs Nina Martin / Mary Dyess6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDayna Mayer / Melissa Barrett vs Debra McKinley / Tricia Murphy2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJo Ann Grooms / Erna de Boer vs Janice Rogers / Deborah Lowe1-6, 1-6
2025-02-23vs Huskey -FaulknerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMelissa Barrett / Ann Skogerboe vs Joyce Mallory / Deedee Keener3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDeesa Loving / Lisa McCrary vs Connie McMillin / Kelly Michaels4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-02-16vs Nunez - FaulknerLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeesa Loving / Lisa McCrary vs Christina Nunez / Snizhana Zhdanova4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMelissa Barrett / Ann Skogerboe vs Kimberly Park / Lisa Losack1-6, 6-7
2025-02-09vs Green -FaulknerSplit 11
W#2 DoublesAnn Skogerboe / Dayna Mayer vs Candice Gast Wilcox / Janice Rogers6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDeesa Loving / Erna de Boer vs Yumiko Green / Shannon Lutmer6-2, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Ann Skogerboe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Angie Russell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Deesa Loving
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Dayna Mayer
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.13
Melissa Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Lisa McCrary
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.80
Erna de Boer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
Jo Ann Grooms
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Lianne Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Deesa Loving + Lisa McCrary10459% games+6.2% vs expected
Ann Skogerboe + Dayna Mayer7068% games+5.7% vs expected
Ann Skogerboe + Melissa Barrett2349% gamesnot enough data
Dayna Mayer + Melissa Barrett224 matchesnot enough data
Deesa Loving + Dayna Mayer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Skogerboe
20W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Angie Russell
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Deesa Loving
16W–9L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Dayna Mayer
16W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.21
Melissa Barrett
11W–14L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%84%<1%
3.13
Lisa McCrary
12W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.10
3.5
Erna de Boer
0W–7L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.80
Jo Ann Grooms
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Lianne Sanchez
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.