Teams

Battle Ready

2021 Montgomery Adult 18 & Over Spring · Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 4.40 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-06-22vs CarsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesWendy Carey / Mary Papadopulos vs Michele Diez / Ele Pratt2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Miriam Ostria6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesWendy Heger vs Clara Wang2-6, 0-6
2021-06-16vs Acing GracefullyWon 40
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Riette van Laack6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristina Leary / Kaitlyn Heo vs Janet Opar / Janet Miller6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesWendy Heger vs Joan Ray6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBattsetseg Tsagaan / Terri Mrozinski vs Valerie Meriot-Burn / Capri Harrison6-3, 6-4
2021-06-12vs Honey BadgersWon 21
W#1 DoublesValerie Robbins / Tatiana Loboda vs Bethany Petrofsky / Anita Wilson6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesTerri Mrozinski vs Deborah Greenside5-7, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAgnes Trice / Kristina Leary vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-06-02vs RubinoWon 30
W#1 DoublesVirginia Fung / Kaitlyn Heo vs Susan Lapetina / Carolyn Greis6-3, 6-4
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Wendy Beale6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWendy Carey / Mary Papadopulos vs Heather Sine / Margaret Rubino7-5, 7-5
2021-05-23vs League of Our Own IIIWon 30
W#1 SinglesAgnes Trice vs Angela Thorpe6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Valerie Robbins vs Sharon Huang / Julia Latein-Kimmig6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesWendy Heger vs Mia Piansay6-0, 6-1
2021-05-17vs Honey BadgersWon 10
W#2 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Wendy Carey vs Pilar Falo / Cara Holtmann6-3, 6-1
2021-05-11vs Acing GracefullyWon 30
W#1 DoublesWendy Carey / Mary Papadopulos vs Janet Miller / Jackie Livesay6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesTerri Mrozinski vs Katya Vert-Wong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristina Leary / Valerie Robbins vs Shalen Fairbanks / Lisa Kokoszka6-3, 6-0
2021-05-02vs RubinoWon 20
W#2 SinglesWendy Heger vs Danielle Woo6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesErica Miller / Kristina Leary vs Kerry Spicer / Susan Lapetina6-4, 6-3
2021-04-28vs CarsonWon 21
W#1 SinglesChristen Harsha vs Amy Hafey6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTatiana Loboda / Valerie Robbins vs Michele Diez / Ele Pratt2-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesKaitlyn Heo vs Clara Wang6-2, 6-3
2021-04-17vs League of Our Own IIIWon 30
W#1 DoublesMalika Rasheed / Tatiana Loboda vs Julia Latein-Kimmig / Judy Pretka6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesVirginia Fung / Agnes Trice vs Karen Robertson / Donna Fitzgerald6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Papadopulos / Wendy Carey vs Betty Lee / Mia Piansay6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.79
Angel Batkins
published 5
4.72
Kaitlyn Heo
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.58
Christen Harsha
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 5
Crystal Cornell
published 4.5
4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.12
Pamela Dean
published
4.05
Tatiana Loboda
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.02
Wendy Heger
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Virginia Fung
published
3.69
Mary Papadopulos
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.60
Kristina Leary
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Agnes Trice
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.27
Terri Mrozinski
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jessica Lee
published
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Malika Rasheed
published
Wendy Carey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary Papadopulos + Kristina Leary10064% games+4.9% vs expected
Kaitlyn Heo + Christen Harsha9080% gamesnot enough data
Kaitlyn Heo + Kristina Leary404 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Leary + Pamela Dean123 matchesnot enough data
Kristina Leary + Christen Harsha303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Angel Batkins
13W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%6%
4.79
5
Kaitlyn Heo
128W–63L career · 3 lines in 2021
5%94%1%
4.72
5
Christen Harsha
482W–135L career · 4 lines in 2021
28%72%<1%
4.58
4.5
Crystal Cornell
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
4.18
Pamela Dean
40W–40L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
4.12
4.5
Tatiana Loboda
178W–130L career · 4 lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Wendy Heger
142W–188L career · 4 lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
4.02
Virginia Fung
60W–44L career · no lines in 2021
<1%89%10%
3.83
4
Mary Papadopulos
178W–103L career · 5 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Kristina Leary
272W–166L career · 4 lines in 2021
22%78%<1%
3.60
4
Agnes Trice
211W–131L career · 3 lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.54
3.5
Terri Mrozinski
366W–431L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.27
Jessica Lee
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Malika Rasheed
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Wendy Carey
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.