Teams

Team 2

2021 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0

5 players · average NTRP 3.83 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2021-04-24Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Stephanie Fliakas vs Elizabeth Baker / Sherry Schnabel3-6, 1-6
2021-04-17vs Team 12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Means / Sarah Moore vs Caitlin Levanson / Ann Dean0-6, 3-6
2021-04-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Anna Weinstein vs Dawn Siebenhaar / Anna Arnone1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-04-15vs Team 15 ShotmakersSplit 11
L#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Lyn Young vs Gretchen Weidner / Bonnie Lefbom3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Fliakas / Lisa Means vs Elisabeth Barrand / Cheryl Hughes6-3, 6-4
2021-04-11vs Team 4 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Lisa Means vs Kathleen Leary / Amanda L B Ronco0-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-03-28Won 10
W#2 DoublesErrin Matechak / Sachi Pilkenton vs Jann Cassady / Lisa Greenfield6-2, 6-3
2021-03-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLyn Young / Errin Matechak vs Ikuko Dimond / Theresa Gooden4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2021-03-20Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Anna Weinstein vs Melinda Capitano / Sibyll Jones6-1, 6-4
2021-03-14Won 10
W#1 DoublesErrin Matechak / Sachi Pilkenton vs Victoria Rader / Anna Arnone6-1, 6-4
2021-03-12vs Team 17 Chicks of the NightLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Means / Sarah Moore vs Carrie Alfalaij / Erin Green0-6, 1-6
2021-03-06vs Team 9 ICC Bubbles & BlingLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Means / Sarah Moore vs Meghan Tidwell / Lorena McCalister1-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Errin Matechak
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Edie Ashton
published 4
3.52
Sarah Moore
published
3.49
Nancy Rowland
published
2.94
Lisa Means
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Errin Matechak
176W–161L career · 7 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Edie Ashton
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sarah Moore
1W–4L career · no lines in 2021
44%56%<1%
3.52
Nancy Rowland
1W–5L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Lisa Means
46W–131L career · 6 lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.