Teams

BP - Kowalewski

2025 · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall

17 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-21vs SCC - LevittWon 31
L#1 DoublesThomas Oxnard / Edgardo Ramirez vs Brad Ashton / Reid Owens4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNoah Tompkins vs Levi Vasquez6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesStephen Stanley / Neil Ligon vs William Wong / John Locke6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWilliam Murphy / Noriel Lipat vs David Scoggin / Jeff Griswold7-6, 6-4
2025-10-14vs SG&YC - (Schivera)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesNeil Ligon / Stephen Stanley vs Josh Michelsen / Matt Allen0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesNoah Tompkins vs Max Lemaigre2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Dodson / Kevin Belli vs Joe Gussler / James Klein0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesCole Chenowith / Thomas Oxnard vs Brent Watts / Mark Sutton6-4, 6-0
2025-10-07vs RH - MalinowskiLost 12
W#1 SinglesEdgardo Ramirez vs Karsten Smith6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesKevin Belli vs Chau Truong0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJessen Fahey / Noriel Lipat vs Donald King / Anthony Bensch2-6, 3-6
2025-09-30vs The Landings - MoeschWon 32
L#1 DoublesStephen Stanley / Alex Mangum vs Dean Moesch / Walter Strong III2-6, 6-7
W#1 SinglesEdgardo Ramirez vs Grayson Lowenthal6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesThomas Oxnard / Neil Ligon vs Chad Brooks / Patrick Brooks6-0, 6-0
L#2 SinglesWilly Wilner vs Will Witherspoon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCole Chenowith / Jessen Fahey vs Greg Luther / Brian Mitchell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-23vs CRC - Copic/GageWon 32
L#1 DoublesNoriel Lipat / Kevin Belli vs Stephen Craig Burns / Andrew Jones1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesNoah Tompkins vs Samuel Gage6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Burger / Stephen Stanley vs Andrija Copic / Dmitri Chang7-5, 7-5
W#2 SinglesWilly Wilner vs Jimmy Moss6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCole Chenowith / William Murphy vs Ricky John / Sergio Coretti1-6, 0-6
2025-09-16vs BP - BrewsterSplit 22
W#1 DoublesNeil Ligon / Edgardo Ramirez vs Mohamed Chala / Diego Cardenas6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNoah Tompkins vs George Butler6-2, 6-4
L#2 SinglesWilly Wilner vs Gustavo Cardone2-6, 4-5
L#3 DoublesStephen Stanley / Kevin Belli vs Ananth Narayan / Haze Matthews6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 2026 SATA USTA Adult 18 & Over (Men) - Fall
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SATA/Butch Durrence8118924241
2BP - Kowalewski45141329239
3RH - Sanocki45121537263
4SCC - Frischer/Avendano27101739267

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Edgardo Ramirez
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.91
Noah Tompkins
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.90
Neil Ligon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.87
Jackson Floyd
published
3.82
Laurent Guitton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
3.81
Thomas Oxnard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Alex Mangum
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Tim Burger
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.65
Stephen Stanley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.61
Cole Chenowith
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Noriel Lipat
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.53
Kevin Belli
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.47
Jessen Fahey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
James Dodson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Edward Kowalewski
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
William Murphy
published
Willy Wilner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Burger + Stephen Stanley6549% games−1.6% vs expected
Jessen Fahey + Noriel Lipat134 matchesnot enough data
Alex Mangum + Thomas Oxnard314 matchesnot enough data
Cole Chenowith + Thomas Oxnard213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Edgardo Ramirez
23W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.94
Noah Tompkins
7W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%73%26%
3.91
Neil Ligon
13W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.90
Jackson Floyd
14W–2L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Laurent Guitton
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
Thomas Oxnard
21W–9L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Alex Mangum
13W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.76
Tim Burger
33W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.66
Stephen Stanley
20W–25L career · 5 lines in 2026
14%85%1%
3.65
4
Cole Chenowith
5W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.61
Noriel Lipat
10W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
38%62%<1%
3.54
Kevin Belli
19W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jessen Fahey
20W–26L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
3.47
James Dodson
25W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
Edward Kowalewski
12W–7L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
William Murphy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Willy Wilner
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.