Teams

E.Fultz 18+

2023 Cap Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.10 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-06vs P.King 18+Won 21
L#2 DoublesBrian Ross / Donald Corey vs Michael Gee / Jeremy Broglin5-7, 5-7
W#2 SinglesEvan Fultz vs Brian McLean6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBen Williams / Les Murray vs AP Blake / Christopher Boneham6-0, 7-5
2023-04-29vs G.LovejoyWon 20
W#1 DoublesPatrick Graney / Donald Corey vs Garrett Lovejoy / Ryan Schmidt4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCharles Clift / Evan Fultz vs Billy Usrey / William Humphries6-1, 6-4
2023-04-22vs R.BurnsWon 20
W#2 DoublesCharles Clift / Evan Fultz vs Hugh Avera / Robert Zimardo6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDonald Corey / Les Murray vs Frank Rizzo / John Esham6-1, 6-1
2023-04-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesBen Williams / Donald Corey vs Gabe Talton / Lee Teague6-0, 6-3
2023-04-15vs D.Farmer1-3.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKyle Faltisco / Evan Fultz vs Dennis Byrd Jr / Clay Fussell6-1, 6-1
2023-04-06vs F.BurbanoWon 20
W#1 SinglesEvan Fultz vs David McNulty6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Ross / Donald Corey vs Joseph Williamson / Todd Sprouse6-3, 6-4
2023-03-18vs P.DoughertySplit 11
L#1 DoublesDonald Corey / Ben Williams vs Andrew Pearl / Alexander Ismail4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAndre Rodriguez / Evan Fultz vs Scott Thurston / Gary la Manna6-1, 6-2
2023-03-04vs M.GentryWon 20
W#2 DoublesEvan Fultz / Andre Rodriguez vs Matthew Levine / Mike Royal6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDonald Corey / Kevin Stewart vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Kyle Faltisco
published
3.32
Jeffrey Pollack
published
3.21
Evan Fultz
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.17
Trey Morris
published
3.16
Patrick Graney
published
3.06
Steve Crell
published
3.06
Brian Ross
published 3
3.04
Charles Clift
published 3
2.65
Les Murray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Donald Corey
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Les Murray + Donald Corey3352% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Faltisco
7W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%28%72%
3.58
Jeffrey Pollack
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.32
3.5
Evan Fultz
115W–110L career · 13 lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Trey Morris
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Patrick Graney
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
Steve Crell
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Brian Ross
32W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
3.06
3
Charles Clift
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Les Murray
50W–73L career · 2 lines in 2023
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Donald Corey
23W–27L career · 7 lines in 2023
32%67%<1%
2.56

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.