Teams

Yadkin/Lowman 40+ 7.5 Wednesday nights

2026 Yadkin Valley Combo 40 & Over · Women 7.5 - Wednesday Nights

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2026-08-19vs Yadkin/Tatum/40+7.5Lost 12
L#1 DoublesShawn McFarlin / Julia Barnes vs Kimberly Busse / Sarah Eugenia Gallo6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynn Guglielmo / Lindsay Reynolds vs Christia Fisher / Danielle Wright7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMary Beth Hartman / Laura Varsik vs Lisa Davis / Meghan de Young6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 - Wednesday Nights have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Shawn McFarlin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Lynn Guglielmo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Mary Hennessee
published
3.53
Laura Varsik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.52
Mary Beth Hartman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Lindsay Reynolds
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Kristi Nicholson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.36
Julia Barnes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Rebecca Hartsough
published
3.31
Kathy Brown
published
3.30
Amy Backus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Laura Gregory
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.21
Linda Lowman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Lowman + Lynn Guglielmo3248% games−1.2% vs expected
Kristi Nicholson + Rebecca Hartsough4445% games−1.5% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Amy Backus131351% games−2.0% vs expected
Linda Lowman + Rebecca Hartsough224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Hartsough + Amy Backus134 matchesnot enough data
Shawn McFarlin + Julia Barnes123 matchesnot enough data
Shawn McFarlin + Lynn Guglielmo123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shawn McFarlin
184W–155L career · 1 line in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
Lynn Guglielmo
20W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
Mary Hennessee
5W–3L career · no lines in 2026
12%87%1%
3.66
Laura Varsik
56W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Mary Beth Hartman
91W–66L career · 1 line in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.52
Lindsay Reynolds
26W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Kristi Nicholson
72W–61L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%84%16%
3.36
Julia Barnes
22W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
1%84%15%
3.36
Rebecca Hartsough
40W–34L career · no lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Amy Backus
32W–36L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
Laura Gregory
22W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24
Linda Lowman
43W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.