Teams

2EAST-MONTE 18&O MIX 10.0 SEM

2024 SEM MIX SUMMER 18 & OVER · 10.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 4.83 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-13vs 1CHIP-MESSICK 18&O MIX 10.0 SEMLost 03
L#1 DoublesElena Strakhova / Peter Wagner vs Kendra Clark / Dean Boodakian3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Austin Huynh vs Libbey Rhegness / Luke Moorhead4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarla Jewell / Derek Sammons vs Camie Messick / Richard Berens2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-30vs 1CHIP-MESSICK 18&O MIX 10.0 SEMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Prigorac / Nynke van der Goot vs Libbey Rhegness / Luke Moorhead0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElena Strakhova / Austin Huynh vs Camie Messick / Michael Calderone6-4, 6-4
2024-07-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarla Jewell / Matthew Prigorac vs David Atallah / Kelly Smith3-6, 3-6
2024-07-09vs 1CHIP-MESSICK 18&O MIX 10.0 SEMLost 01
L#1 DoublesDerek Sammons / Carla Jewell vs Camie Messick / Michael Calderone6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-06-25vs 3PINE-in-ATALLAH 18&O MIX 10.0 SEMLost 01
L#1 DoublesAustin Huynh / Yahsha Moore vs Alex Matisse / Eva Stevanovic3-6, 3-6
W#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Austin Huynh vs Daria Haupt / Eric Podgorny5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElena Strakhova / Peter Wagner vs Kelly Smith / Michael Sendor6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrian Nguyen / Nynke van der Goot vs Lenhard Haupt / Alexandra Whall4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 10.0 SEM SUM MIX 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
11CHIP-MESSICK 18&O MIX 10.0 SEM4211718154
22EAST-MONTE 18&O MIX 10.0 SEM429922175
33PINE-in-ATALLAH 18&O MIX 10.0 SEM1571125188

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.39 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.77
Ayumi Sasaki
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.69
Carla Jewell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.66
Austin Huynh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.41
Matthew Prigorac
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.39
Peter Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.32
McCall Monte
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.32
Derek Sammons
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Brian Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 5
3.92
Jordan Andrews
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Elena Strakhova
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Nynke van der Goot
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Yahsha Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matthew Prigorac + Ayumi Sasaki5156% gamesnot enough data
Derek Sammons + McCall Monte404 matchesnot enough data
Brian Nguyen + Elena Strakhova314 matchesnot enough data
Austin Huynh + Elena Strakhova213 matchesnot enough data
Jordan Andrews + Ayumi Sasaki303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Ayumi Sasaki
71W–25L career · 10 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Carla Jewell
21W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.69
5
Austin Huynh
77W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.66
Matthew Prigorac
120W–41L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
4.41
Peter Wagner
52W–44L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
4.39
4.5
McCall Monte
176W–80L career · 6 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
4.5
Derek Sammons
103W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
4.32
5
Brian Nguyen
41W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.04
Jordan Andrews
36W–11L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.92
Elena Strakhova
61W–48L career · 15 lines in 2024
not enough data
Nynke van der Goot
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Yahsha Moore
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.