Teams

Treviso Bay - Hamilton

2022 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-03-10Won 10
W#3 DoublesMarybeth Broderick / Mary Sams vs Karen Kelly / Elaine Leffingwell-King6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLouise Decker / Cheryl Rauch vs Debbie Quitadamo / Patricia Miles6-0, 3-6, 0-1
2022-02-24Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKathy Hamilton / Louise Decker vs Isabelle Adly / Lauren Hattenbach3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarybeth Broderick / Shari Schiller vs Gloria Anderson / Jean Martin4-6, 3-6
2022-02-17vs Bay Colony - O'MearaWon 10
W#2 DoublesMarybeth Broderick / Denise Reilly vs Sheri Abrams / Graceann Hoopes6-3, 6-1
2022-02-10vs Mediterra - KingSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Leslie Sistla vs Deborah Fernicola / Annette McCann3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDenise Reilly / Marybeth Broderick vs Ebby Lacey / Jennifer Amaya6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-02-03Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Leslie Sistla vs Gay Kronen / Christine Kriss3-6, 5-7
2022-01-27vs Naples Grande - GhilardiLost 01
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Louise Decker vs Megan Losier / Dot Hall6-7, 3-6
2022-01-26vs Pelican Marsh - BishopWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Cheryl Rauch vs Charlene Ruccolo / Judy Kobel6-2, 6-4
2022-01-13vs Marco YMCA - L.KeelyLost 02
L#1 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Louise Decker vs Denise Marcos / Dale Zumsande3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeslie Sistla / Marybeth Broderick vs Linda Keely / Kelly Lord7-6, 0-6, 0-1
2022-01-06Won 10
W#1 DoublesLouise Decker / Cheryl Rauch vs Barbara Hess / Candace Cartwright6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Denise Reilly
published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
2.83
Marybeth Broderick
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Kathy Hamilton
published
Katie Boyer
published
Louise Decker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Mary Sams
published
Maureen Sullivan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louise Decker + Cheryl Rauch2456% gamesnot enough data
Mary Sams + Maureen Sullivan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Reilly
54W–37L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 9 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.25
3.5
Marybeth Broderick
18W–68L career · type A · 5 lines in 2022
91%9%<1%
2.83
Kathy Hamilton
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Katie Boyer
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Louise Decker
47W–46L career · 12 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Sams
1W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Maureen Sullivan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.