Teams

SB-LLW--Les Racquettes-Annie Dzierski

2022 SCTA Doubles League - Santa Barbara · SB - Women Doubles - 3.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.59 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-18vs SBTC-Lemon DropsWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Daley / Rosanne Marquis vs Katherine Fabbre / Shannon Grant6-2, 2-6, 1-0
2022-12-17vs Pershing-PLT'sWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Brenna Robinson vs Suzanne Steele / Karen Solomon6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrea Borgatello Forry / Walden Bohnet vs Susan Bornhurst / Diana Cuttrell6-3, 6-2
2022-11-13vs SBTC-Lemon DropsWon 10
W#2 DoublesBrenna Robinson / Rosanne Marquis vs Serena Weddle / Kristina Holdren6-4, 6-4
2022-10-23vs SBTC-Lemon DropsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Monica Wilson vs Lisa MacHado / Amy Jakobson4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-16vs Pershing-PLT'sWon 10
W#3 DoublesRosanne Marquis / Yolanda Ramirez vs MARGARET LEARMONTH / Tracy Selbie6-4, 6-4
2022-09-18vs Pershing-PLT'sWon 20
W#2 DoublesAnnie Dzierski / Rosanne Marquis vs Diana Cuttrell / Katherine Morris6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesWalden Bohnet / Kristin Mcwilliams vs Marjie Kirn / MARGARET LEARMONTH2-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women Doubles - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.33
Kersten Barr
published
3.63
Christina Stoney
published 4
3.62
Carrie Randolph
published 4
3.55
Lisa Daley
published
3.53
Jen Haskell
published
3.43
Monica Wilson
published
3.42
Felisa Manion
published 3.5
3.29
Barbara Balents
published 3.5
Brenna Robinson
published 3.5
Clare Gonzalez
published 3.5
Daria Boxer
published 3.5
3.23
Walden Bohnet
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.13
Annie Dzierski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Rosanne Marquis
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Kristin Mcwilliams
published
Kyra Rogers
published
Meichelle Arntz
published
Pamela Westlund
published
Rachael Stein
published
Veronica Buck-Tomm
published
Yolanda Ramirez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carrie Randolph + Christina Stoney7358% games+5.6% vs expected
Walden Bohnet + Lisa Daley2346% games+3.6% vs expected
Carrie Randolph + Andrea Borgatello Forry2350% games−2.7% vs expected
Rachael Stein + Kristin Mcwilliams1531% games−8.7% vs expected
Annie Dzierski + Monica Wilson224 matchesnot enough data
Rosanne Marquis + Andrea Borgatello Forry224 matchesnot enough data
Monica Wilson + Felisa Manion404 matchesnot enough data
Annie Dzierski + Rosanne Marquis213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kersten Barr
29W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
4.33
4
Christina Stoney
23W–16L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
4
Carrie Randolph
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Lisa Daley
22W–14L career · no lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jen Haskell
22W–21L career · no lines in 2022
42%58%<1%
3.53
Monica Wilson
28W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Felisa Manion
30W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Andrea Borgatello Forry
17W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Barbara Balents
6W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Brenna Robinson
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Clare Gonzalez
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Daria Boxer
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Walden Bohnet
78W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Annie Dzierski
124W–118L career · 3 lines in 2022
15%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Rosanne Marquis
66W–109L career · 4 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kristin Mcwilliams
15W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kyra Rogers
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Meichelle Arntz
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Westlund
6W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachael Stein
4W–16L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Veronica Buck-Tomm
2W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Yolanda Ramirez
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.