Teams

SDNC 7.0 Morgan Run/ Filicia

2022 Mixed Doubles 18 & Over Winter- SDNC · SDNC - 7.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-26vs SDNC 7.0 Rancho Santa Fe/ BastiasWon 10
W#3 DoublesEileen Gonzalez / Jim Filicia vs Marisel Bastias / Jeff Kelleher6-3, 7-5
2022-03-19Won 10
W#3 DoublesEileen Gonzalez / Jim Filicia vs Emily Beach / MICHAEL GONZALEZ6-0, 6-3
2022-03-12vs SDNC LLW 7.0 RBS&T/ MaddenLost 02
L#2 DoublesJim Filicia / Kristin Norby vs Wayne Klusmeier / Charis Ioannides6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBill Sudlow / Robyn Rice vs Joy Madden / Michael Zhou1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKristin Norby / Bill Sudlow vs Jenny McGowan / Michael McGowan1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEdna Mattei / Tim Miller vs Tricia Bothmer / Tom Vu1-6, 2-6
2022-02-12vs SDNC 7.0 RPTC/ TaillacLost 01
L#3 DoublesBill Sudlow / Robyn Rice vs Rita Murphy / Dan Taillac6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJim Filicia / Eileen Gonzalez vs Clare Lemon / Gurdon Hornor7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#1 DoublesJim Filicia / Eileen Gonzalez vs Christine Tangarie / Tom Vu3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBill Sudlow / Robyn Rice vs Diana Clark / James Pennington3-6, 3-6
2022-01-22Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJim Filicia / Eileen Gonzalez vs Charis Ioannides / Wayne Klusmeier4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Edna Mattei
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.39
Jim Filicia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.36
Danna Dickson
published 3.5
3.20
Bill Sudlow
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.07
Rebekah Seidel
published
2.95
Robyn Rice
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.73
Eileen Gonzalez
published 3
2.68
Elizabeth Li
published 3
2.60
Brian Burger
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edna Mattei + Bill Sudlow4555% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Rice + Bill Sudlow1438% gamesnot enough data
Jim Filicia + Danna Dickson123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Edna Mattei
45W–46L career · 1 line in 2022
52%48%<1%
3.50
3.5
Jim Filicia
108W–90L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Danna Dickson
47W–25L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Bill Sudlow
53W–108L career · 4 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.20
Rebekah Seidel
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.07
3.5
Robyn Rice
103W–115L career · 3 lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
3
Eileen Gonzalez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Li
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
2.68
3
Brian Burger
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.