Teams

Ke.Hurter18C5.5

2024 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-08vs Da.Rusnak18C5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCaroline Ives / Anne Enberg vs Heather Word / Ashley Lindeman6-2, 0-6, 0-1
2024-09-26vs Ki.Meeker18CSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCaroline Ives / Anne Enberg vs Holly Gyovai / Sarah Herring4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Hurter / Rebecca Harris vs Natalie Hudson / Jacqueline Tomlin6-2, 6-3
2024-09-12vs Em.Best18CLost 02
L#1 DoublesChristine Johnson / Anne Enberg vs Kristin Esham / Jessica Willetts1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Ives / Kelly Hurter vs Amy Cantando / Nicole Masters3-6, 5-7
2024-09-05vs Ca.Schuch18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesAnne Enberg / Caroline Ives vs Courtney Mellott / Taylor Anthony1-6, 2-6
2024-08-29vs Ma.Riddick18CWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Enberg / Courtney Grinnell vs Paige Coltrera / Meagan Heath6-2, 6-3
2024-08-22vs Me.Green18CLost 01
L#3 DoublesKelly Hurter / Alex Snukals vs Melissa Green / Shannon Marconi2-6, 4-6
2024-08-16vs Ki.Meeker18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Snukals / Anne Enberg vs Kimberlie Meeker / Jennifer Lawrence5-7, 2-6
2024-08-01vs Ca.Schuch18CLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlex Snukals / Kelly Hurter vs Savannah Davidsson / Cooper Thornhill0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Anne Enberg
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.84
2.74
Megan Oneill
published
2.62
Kelly Hurter
usually #2 Doubles 78%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.58
Alex Snukals
published 3
2.47
Caroline Ives
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.24
Nina Schweitzer
published
2.21
Debi Booker
published 2.5
Rebecca Harris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Ives + Kelly Hurter213 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Ives + Anne Enberg033 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Hurter + Anne Enberg213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Enberg
26W–19L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.02
3
Courtney Grinnell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
Megan Oneill
7W–9L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
2.5
Kelly Hurter
54W–30L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%19%81%
2.62
3
Alex Snukals
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
2.58
3
Caroline Ives
23W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
Nina Schweitzer
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
0%98%2%
2.24
2.5
Debi Booker
3W–7L career · no lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
Rebecca Harris
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.