Teams

Ma.Morriston18C

2026 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 5.5 Men

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-11vs De.Farmer18C5.5Won 30
W#1 DoublesTHOMAS SIBRIZZI / Patrick Mcdade vs Prayush Khadka / Seshagiri Medarametla7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrew Sonnier / Dj Ferris vs Sunil Neelappa / Ravikumar Perumal7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJohn van Ness / Elliott Blades vs Ryan Osswald / Gary Carlson6-0, 6-0
2026-08-04vs Da.Wascher18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesElliott Blades / Vijayanand Periannan vs Bryan Sutton / Nathaniel Turck5-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesAndrew Sonnier / Surin Patel vs Ryan Lowden / Daniel Wascher6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTHOMAS SIBRIZZI / Emmet Clark vs Reid Watson / Nick Alena3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 5.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sp.Anderson18C2042550
2Da.Wascher18C2154985
3Ma.Morriston18C1142552
4De.Farmer18C5.51124854
5Ra.Raj18C0112532
6Sh.Littleton18C0224965

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.78
Dwayne Deloatch
published 3
2.72
Elliott Blades
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.68
John van Ness
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
2.63
Andrew Sonnier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.63
Marc Morriston
published 3
2.61
Vijayanand Periannan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Surin Patel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
THOMAS SIBRIZZI
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.39
Emmet Clark
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.31
Patrick Mcdade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Dj Ferris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Chidi Madu
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marc Morriston + THOMAS SIBRIZZI2347% games−4.0% vs expected
John van Ness + Elliott Blades303 matchesnot enough data
Emmet Clark + Dj Ferris303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Dwayne Deloatch
26W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
2.78
Elliott Blades
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.72
John van Ness
8W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Christopher Leonard
4W–5L career · no lines in 2026
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Andrew Sonnier
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Marc Morriston
17W–43L career · no lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Vijayanand Periannan
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Surin Patel
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
THOMAS SIBRIZZI
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.48
Emmet Clark
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
0%79%21%
2.39
Patrick Mcdade
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.31
Dj Ferris
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Chidi Madu
4W–3L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.