Teams

Fee - Luer

2024 Brevard Adult 55 & Over · 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-03-01vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGinny Barnes / Katharyn Luer vs Lori Abbott / Linda Carrillo2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Renee Jiannine vs Jennifer Roberts / Connie Sicilia1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-23vs Viera Regional Park - ShannonWon 20
W#1 DoublesMisha Whidden / Renee Jiannine vs Susan Ford / Joanne Ringrose6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Jacinta Iezzi vs Mary Stoops / Bev Youngquist6-1, 6-0
2024-02-16Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMisha Whidden / Renee Jiannine vs Judith Carper / Pamela Holt6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-02-09vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Ginny Barnes vs Mary Failla / Rose Cornu6-7, 0-6
2024-02-03vs Viera Regional Park - ShannonWon 20
W#1 DoublesAdrienne Schier / Janis Mena vs Susan Ford / Linda Hall6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Debra Zeitz vs Mary Stoops / Joanne Ringrose6-2, 6-0
2024-02-02vs Viera Regional Park - ShannonSplit 11
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Ginny Barnes vs Bev Youngquist / Carla Norton6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesJanis Mena / Debra Zeitz vs Elizabeth Shannon / Mary Stoops3-6, 1-6
2024-01-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Schier / Janis Mena vs Yvonne Devanney / Suzanne Gilmore0-6, 4-6
2024-01-19vs Brevard/Lowe/55&Over6.0WSplit 11
W#2 DoublesJanis Mena / Ginny Barnes vs Mary Failla / Connie Sicilia6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Debra Zeitz vs Laureen Lowe / Rose Cornu5-7, 2-6
2024-01-05Split 11
L#1 DoublesAdrienne Schier / Renee Jiannine vs Suzanne Gilmore / Yvonne Devanney4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatharyn Luer / Ginny Barnes vs Geri James / Pamela Holt6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.04
Janis Mena
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.93
Renee Jiannine
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.91
Katharyn Luer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Adrienne Schier
published 3
2.69
Laurie Wakins
published
Jacinta Iezzi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katharyn Luer + Renee Jiannine13659% games+11.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Janis Mena
72W–58L career · type A · 6 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.04
3
Renee Jiannine
104W–89L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
3
Katharyn Luer
158W–172L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Adrienne Schier
no matches on record · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Laurie Wakins
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.69
Jacinta Iezzi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.