← Teams

VAC-Lipper VAC4Fun

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 4.5 Women

3 players · average NTRP 4.17 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / SOUTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Brenda Williams
published 4.5
3.76
Angela Keck
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.62
Melanie Redding
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
Results6 ties
2021-04-24Lost 0–2
L#2 DoublesAngela Keck / Kathy Hunter vs Lisa Gray / Reva Wallace7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMelanie Redding / Patty Kilmer vs Tami Davis / Colleen Sharkey6-0, 6-2
2021-04-17Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesYoung Hansen / Melanie Redding vs Deanna Latendresse / Renee Peterson2-0
2021-04-11Won 1–0
W#1 SinglesAngela Keck vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-04-03Lost 0–2
L#1 SinglesAngela Keck vs Huong Lakin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLinda Berghoff / Melanie Redding vs April Gentry / Lisa Gray6-2, 6-2
2021-03-27Won 1–0
W#3 DoublesMelanie Redding / Young Hansen vs Andrea Maison / Marina Cheng6-0, 2-6, 1-0
2021-03-21Lost 0–2
L#1 DoublesMelanie Redding / Linda Berghoff vs Jenifer Diegel / Melisa Biscayno6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAngela Keck vs Sachiko Ishihara-Spray6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Brenda Williams
66W–47L career
25%75%0%
3.96
4
Angela Keck
80W–104L career
0%99%0%
3.76
4
Melanie Redding
110W–136L career
8%92%0%
3.62

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.