← Teams

N OR-MAC-Lekas

2023 Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
JOHN KNOX
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
—
Jim Lekas
published 3.5
3.25
Mark Hudspeth
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
—
Philip Flemming
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
—
William Reykalin
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.24
Tony Humpage
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Results12 ties
2023-09-23Lost 0–1
L#2 DoublesJim Lekas / William Reykalin vs Wayne Kohan / Bryan Coles7-5, 6-0
2023-09-22Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Philip Flemming vs Thomas Henderson / John Lindberg6-0, 6-4
2023-09-21Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesJim Lekas / William Reykalin vs Bill Zinck / George Sampson6-2, 6-2
2023-05-18Lost 0–1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Philip Flemming vs Randy Boose / Eugene Avery7-5, 6-4
2023-05-09Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs David Lee / Steven Ryan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJOHN KNOX / William Reykalin vs RICK ROGOWAY / Shirish Patel7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs KRIKOR NACCACHIAN / Jim Cullison0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-05-04Won 2–1
W#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Scott Mayer / Keith Jones6-2, 6-6
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Bert Berends / Les Wellman6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesPhillip Juckeland / William Reykalin vs Alan Kaplan / Larry Butrick6-1, 6-3
2023-05-02Split 1–1
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / JOHN KNOX vs Alan Jones / John Wallin6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPhillip Juckeland / Philip Flemming vs David Shook / Jeff Sunshine6-4, 6-2
2023-04-27Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Philip Flemming vs Eramo Gonzalez / Shirish Patel7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChip Burczak / Jeffrey Bayless vs John Walsh / KRIKOR NACCACHIAN7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWilliam Reykalin / Phillip Juckeland vs Rick Saries / Kevin Scott6-2, 6-4
2023-04-26Won 2–0
W#2 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Craig Walker / Dave Sato6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Jeffrey Bayless vs Charles Gebhardt / Paul Koenigsberg6-2, 6-0
2023-04-20Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Craig Frasier / Donny Cablao4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJim Lekas / Jeffrey Bayless vs Robin Olson / John Hummel5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMatthew Casimo / Philip Flemming vs Paul Koenigsberg / Dave Sato7-5, 6-3
2023-04-06Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesChip Burczak / Tony Humpage vs Randy Boose / Mike Weedall7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Jim Lekas vs Eugene Avery / Terry Chung6-1, 6-1
2023-03-23Split 1–1
W#1 DoublesJOHN KNOX / Mark Hudspeth vs Richard Gronostajski / Fraser Ghezel6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPhilip Flemming / Matthew Casimo vs Clay Funkhouser / Jon Mandeville6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
JOHN KNOX
23W–18L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Jim Lekas
22W–12L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Mark Hudspeth
5W–10L career
8%87%5%
3.25
3.5
Philip Flemming
4W–11L career
not enough data
—
3.5
William Reykalin
5W–14L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Tony Humpage
99W–73L career
1%99%0%
3.24
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.