Teams

LMRO-Robson/CSD

2022 Lake Combo Doubles 55 & Over · Men 8.5 Thurs PM

10 players · average NTRP 4.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-13vs LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 55sWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Ken Peppercorn vs Edward Bugg / Kevin Hawkins6-4, 6-1
2022-09-29vs LPKU-Kumar/PACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / George Jackson vs Vincent Altamura / Bill Parrish3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCharles Quinn / Jeremy Cowper vs Michael di Benedictis / Bill Leonard6-3, 6-3
2022-09-26vs LKHaynes-Westport/CSD 55sLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Brinkman / Jeremy Cowper vs Phil Payne / Thomas Griffin2-6, 5-7
2022-09-18vs LPKU-Kumar/PACSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCharles Quinn / Brian Cudney vs Vincent Altamura / William Cooper2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesFrederick Armstrong / Jeremy Cowper vs William Hirata / Pradeep Kumar6-2, 6-0
2022-09-15vs LMFerrero/PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesFrederick Armstrong / Jeremy Cowper vs Jack Horowitz / George Harris6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2022-08-25vs LMFerrero/PACLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Cudney / Steve Brinkman vs Michael Brady / Jim Illing3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKen Peppercorn / Charles Quinn vs Mauro Coruzzi / Samuel Kopchick6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-08-18vs LPKU-Kumar/PACWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichael Flanagan / Jeremy Cowper vs Pradeep Kumar / Bill Parrish6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Rogers Warner
published
4.05
Steve Brinkman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.02
Jon Koceja
published
3.93
Charles Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.87
Jeremy Cowper
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.86
Robert Eric Nielsen
published
3.77
Mark Robson
published
3.76
Brian Cudney
published 4
3.68
Matthew Fairbairn
published
Todd Brandon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeremy Cowper + Mark Robson4172% games+6.4% vs expected
Steve Brinkman + Charles Quinn2941% gamesnot enough data
Jeremy Cowper + Charles Quinn2548% gamesnot enough data
Matthew Fairbairn + Robert Eric Nielsen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rogers Warner
1W–6L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
4.13
4.5
Steve Brinkman
67W–60L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
4.05
Jon Koceja
16W–16L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
4.02
4.5
Charles Quinn
70W–78L career · 3 lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.93
4
Jeremy Cowper
115W–65L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Robert Eric Nielsen
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
Mark Robson
8W–3L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brian Cudney
22W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
Matthew Fairbairn
7W–1L career · no lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.68
Todd Brandon
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.