Teams

5-AJarvis-CHTC

2022 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-04-29vs 2-MMcCullough-EnoWon 20
W#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Lisa Baxter vs Areli Grodski / Anna Jessup6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesColleen Starns vs McPhine Dyson6-2, 6-1
2022-04-22vs 1-DNader-EnoSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJessica Alzamora / Colleen Starns vs Annaliese Gresham / Danielle Nader2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Elizabeth Enderline6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2022-04-13vs 11-KMcWhorter-HVCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesJessica Alzamora / Amber Jarvis vs Rhiannon Ludington / Kelly Jernigan1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Durkin Aux / Colleen Starns vs Valerie Michael / Karen Rabenau0-6, 1-6
2022-04-08vs 3-GLoFrese-EnoLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Colleen Starns vs Krissy Dunn / Alexa Hartenstein0-6, 2-6
2022-04-06vs 10-AKlein-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Laura Chaves Cerdas vs Amanda Alexander Klein / Rachel Mason2-6, 1-6
2022-04-01vs 6-TStefan-HSLost 02
L#1 DoublesCaroline Durkin Aux / Colleen Starns vs Melissa Provost / Catherine Quick0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAmber Jarvis vs Lora Hartman2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-03-30vs 7-ACombs-CCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Starns / Laura Chaves Cerdas vs Stephanie Terrey / Susan Parent4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Caroline Durkin Aux vs Irma Husain / Thuy Brooks2-6, 6-7
2022-03-16vs 9-JYoung-Eno 2.5 18Won 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Baxter / Colleen Starns vs Liz Schaller / Jonda Young6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2022-03-02vs 12-KMiller-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLaura Chaves Cerdas / Colleen Starns vs Kristen Miller / Catherine Everson0-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Samantha Chan vs Melaine Young / Courtney Mangum6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2022-02-23vs 8-LCannon-EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesColleen Starns / Samantha Chan vs Sasha Deutsch-Link / Laura Cannon2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Laura Chaves Cerdas vs Erika Smull / Jennifer Dunlap4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Lisa Baxter
published 3
2.47
Colleen Starns
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 2.5
2.46
Jessica Alzamora
published
2.12
Laura Chaves Cerdas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber Jarvis + Lisa Baxter3258% gamesnot enough data
Amber Jarvis + Colleen Starns224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Amber Jarvis
92W–54L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.45
3
Lisa Baxter
92W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%4%96%
3.23
2.5
Colleen Starns
42W–59L career · 9 lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
Jessica Alzamora
0W–8L career · no lines in 2022
63%37%<1%
2.46
Laura Chaves Cerdas
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.