Teams

Missoula 65+

2023 65 & Over League · Women 7.0 - 65 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MONTANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2023-08-19vs Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Vinton / Elizabeth Orser vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Marie Neergaard3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKathy Nelson / Terri Ruthruff vs Cheryl Scott / Ann Chrisler7-5, 6-3
2023-08-18vs Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0WSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Vinton / Elizabeth Orser vs Marie Neergaard / Nora Miller3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesDebbie Gould / Kathy Nelson vs Julie Shaw / DIANA RAIMONDO6-1, 6-4
2023-07-27vs Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0WLost 12
W#1 DoublesSherry Varner / Terri Ruthruff vs DIANA RAIMONDO / Cyndy Desin6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPeggy Manning / Karen Spierling vs Ann Chrisler / Nora Miller4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJane Selvig / Sally Lentz vs Ritva Porter / Julie Shaw5-7, 5-7
2023-07-27vs Montana/Miller/65&Over7.0WLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarla Luck / Sherry Varner vs Ritva Porter / Julie Shaw5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJane Selvig / Karen Spierling vs Cyndy Desin / DIANA RAIMONDO1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Manning / Sally Lentz vs Ann Chrisler / Nora Miller3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.0 - 65 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Terri Ruthruff
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Carla Luck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Patrice Jackson
published
Debbie Gould
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Orser
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Jane Selvig
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Spierling
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Karen Vinton
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathy Nelson
published
Peggy Manning
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Sally Lentz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherry Varner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Terri Ruthruff + Sherry Varner35961% games+2.5% vs expected
Carla Luck + Jane Selvig213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Terri Ruthruff
94W–44L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Carla Luck
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Patrice Jackson
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Debbie Gould
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
Elizabeth Orser
2W–14L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Selvig
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Spierling
1W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Vinton
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathy Nelson
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Peggy Manning
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sally Lentz
12W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Sherry Varner
80W–48L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.