Teams

PW.McClure

2025 CTRL Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women · Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-05-06Won 10
W#3 DoublesNishi Patel / Amy Dexheimer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-04-30vs CAS.GilbertLost 02
L#1 DoublesNishi Patel / Amy Dexheimer vs Yuna Kim / Julie Pedraza1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Lisa Bradley vs Melissa Valero / Jennie Yeung2-6, 1-6
2025-04-16vs CAS.GilbertSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBrenna Magliulo / Amy Dexheimer vs Christine Qubeck / Julie Pedraza4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLindsay Rigney / Lauren Spiegel vs Terri Jacobsen / Danielle Lamson5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-04-09vs MD.WadeLost 01
L#1 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Jennifer McClure vs Cheryl McCurdy / Caroline Stallings1-6, 1-6
2025-03-26Won 10
W#3 DoublesSmithey Hashagen / Amy Dexheimer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-03-14vs MD.WadeWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmy Dexheimer / Lisa Bradley vs Laurie Godfrey / Sheridan Orr6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-10vs MD.WadeLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer McClure / Lindsay Rigney vs Julia Wade / Melissa Keener2-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.35
Smithey Hashagen
published
2.33
Nishi Patel
published
2.31
Lauren Spiegel
published
2.27
Lindsay Rigney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Emory Lydick
published 2.5
2.15
Brenna Magliulo
published 2.5
2.07
Jennifer McClure
published
2.04
Lisa Bradley
published
2.02
Amy Dexheimer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Julie Ley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Spiegel + Nishi Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Brenna Magliulo + Nishi Patel033 matchesnot enough data
Amy Dexheimer + Emory Lydick033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Smithey Hashagen
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%88%12%
2.35
Nishi Patel
11W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%91%9%
2.33
Lauren Spiegel
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Lindsay Rigney
26W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Emory Lydick
4W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.21
2.5
Brenna Magliulo
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.15
Jennifer McClure
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.07
Lisa Bradley
1W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
2.5
Amy Dexheimer
21W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Julie Ley
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.