Teams

All About that Ace B

2024 Shenandoah Singles Winter Weekend · Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.83 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-03-24vs Rally Cats 3.0Won 21
W#1 SinglesKim Hovda vs Deborah Williams4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Linda Dinga3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesTeri McCarthy vs Erin Clark6-3, 7-6
2024-03-09vs All About That AceWon 21
W#1 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Ann Carter3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesKim Hovda vs TOBI PARK0-6, 3-6
W#3 SinglesCarly Schrager vs Anna Rose6-1, 6-0
2024-02-24vs All About That AceSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKim Hovda vs Anna Rose6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesCarly Schrager vs Amy Kemon1-6, 0-6
2024-02-18Won 10
W#3 SinglesTeri McCarthy vs Erin Clark6-3, 6-2
2024-02-10vs Net ChixLost 02
L#1 SinglesJoi Ruther vs Anna Allen1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesJacy Everling vs Ann Pawlak5-7, 1-6
2024-01-28vs Rally Cats 3.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJacy Everling vs Kristin Gibbs0-6, 0-6
2024-01-20vs All About That AceLost 01
L#1 SinglesKim Hovda vs Elisa Joyner1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Shenandoah Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.71 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Jill Vaughan
published
3.19
Kim Hovda
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.77
Carly Schrager
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
DeAnna Burke
published 3
2.53
Jacy Everling
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
2.46
Janet Bailey
published
2.36
Teri McCarthy
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.25
Joi Ruther
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Jian Wen
published
Melissa Huang
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joi Ruther + Teri McCarthy3638% games−7.7% vs expected
Carly Schrager + Jacy Everling0633% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jill Vaughan
22W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.40
3
Kim Hovda
155W–110L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%7%93%
3.19
3
Carly Schrager
67W–72L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%94%4%
2.77
3
DeAnna Burke
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Jacy Everling
44W–87L career · 2 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.53
Janet Bailey
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
0%63%37%
2.46
2.5
Teri McCarthy
39W–50L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%86%14%
2.36
2.5
Joi Ruther
94W–122L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
Jian Wen
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Huang
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.