Teams

WASHINGTON PK 40AW3.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 3.5

19 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#2 DoublesRobyn Schleifman / Cindy Turner vs Kathlyn Powers / Julia Petrov6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Robyn Schleifman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Minh Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
KIM HOLLAND
published
3.31
Susan Weeks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Renee Mercier
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Susan Zhao
published
3.17
Una Elias
published
3.08
Janicke Polumbo
published
3.07
Marilyn Pellouchoud
published
3.04
Danielle Willis
published 3.5
3.04
Priscilla Z Behidj
published
3.03
Kristin Fairfield
published
2.98
Andrea Akel
published 3
2.91
Lori Belhumeur
published
2.90
Meilan Liu
published
2.83
Maryam Amini
published
2.68
Cora Luber
published 3
2.61
Laura Sumrall
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Ann Haslup
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janicke Polumbo + Susan Zhao4163% gamesnot enough data
Robyn Schleifman + Kristin Fairfield2340% gamesnot enough data
Una Elias + Andrea Akel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Robyn Schleifman
110W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
3.45
Minh Cannon
61W–38L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
KIM HOLLAND
13W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
Susan Weeks
25W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
Renee Mercier
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Susan Zhao
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.25
Una Elias
6W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Janicke Polumbo
16W–15L career · no lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Marilyn Pellouchoud
7W–25L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Willis
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Priscilla Z Behidj
35W–30L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.04
Kristin Fairfield
10W–11L career · no lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
3
Andrea Akel
16W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Lori Belhumeur
14W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
Meilan Liu
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Maryam Amini
8W–24L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Cora Luber
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Laura Sumrall
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Elizabeth Ann Haslup
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.