Teams

Team 3 - Mixed Nuts

2021 Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over Spring · Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 6.0

8 players · average NTRP 3.36 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-06-06vs Team 1 - Creighton FarmsLost 01
L#1 DoublesCassandra Nocera / James Rentsch vs Gina Butler / George Leppert3-6, 1-6
2021-05-20vs Team 2 - Party at the NetWon 20
W#2 DoublesJames Rentsch / Indre Conners vs David Leudemann / Kimberly Butler7-6, 6-0
W#3 DoublesArturo Garcia Alonso / Danielle Davis vs Scott Galus / April Rabayda6-2, 6-3
2021-05-15vs Team 1 - Creighton FarmsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTara Jefferson / Thomas Jefferson vs Gina Butler / Heath Stockton4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNatalia Hozdevila / James Rentsch vs Rebecca Norman / JD Norman3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-05vs Team 1 - Creighton FarmsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDanielle Davis / Arturo Garcia Alonso vs Rebecca Norman / Scott Sullivant3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-28vs Team 2 - Party at the NetLost 01
L#2 DoublesThomas Jefferson / Tara Jefferson vs James Rogers / Vicky Fernandez Urquiaga6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2021-04-17vs Team 2 - Party at the NetLost 01
L#1 DoublesCassandra Nocera / Ivan Kozliak vs Benjamin Butler / Eleanor McManus1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.61
Ivan Kozliak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.31
Arturo Garcia Alonso
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.15
James Shevlin
published 3.5
3.07
Jeannie Matteson
published
2.97
Danielle Davis
published 3.5
2.95
Tara Jefferson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.83
Indre Conners
published 3
2.73
James Rentsch
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tara Jefferson + Ivan Kozliak224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ivan Kozliak
300W–288L career · 1 line in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.61
3.5
Arturo Garcia Alonso
77W–37L career · 5 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.31
3.5
James Shevlin
25W–26L career · no lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.15
Jeannie Matteson
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
3.07
3.5
Danielle Davis
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
60%40%<1%
2.97
3
Tara Jefferson
185W–158L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
James Rentsch
67W–98L career · 3 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.