Teams

2EAST-SASAKI 50NW TH 18&O SEM

2025 bSEM ADULT 18 & OVER NIGHT WOMEN · 5.0 WOMEN THURS PM SEM

11 players · average NTRP 4.75 / S.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-07-31vs 3EAST-MONTE 50NW TH 18&O SEMSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDarylann Gulliver / Elena Strakhova vs McCall Monte / Colleen O'Brien6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Kelly Smith vs Shannon Babcock / Muskaan Ranjan7-5, 6-3
2025-07-31vs 3EAST-MONTE 50NW TH 18&O SEMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesStephanie Schulte / Ayumi Sasaki vs Lia Vernadaki / McCall Monte6-4, 4-4
L#1 SinglesHelaina Pietrowsky vs Agata Szewczuk4-6, 3-6
2025-07-28vs 1CHIP-CLARK 50NW TH 18&O SEMWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobin Rogers / Elena Strakhova vs Anju Taylor / Kendra Clark6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDarylann Gulliver / Kelly Smith vs Meredith Moore / Kristen Charlton4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-07-24vs 4OHCC-GYULAI 50NW TH 18&O SEMLost 02
L#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Elena Strakhova vs Jessica Hill / Myrthe Molenveld3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesValentina Glover / Stephanie Schulte vs Eva Stevanovic / Katalin Gyulai0-6, 1-6
2025-07-17vs 1CHIP-CLARK 50NW TH 18&O SEMWon 20
W#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Elena Strakhova vs Camie Messick / Kendra Clark6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKelly Smith / Lauren Vosicky vs Meredith Moore / Kelsey Vandewege6-3, 6-3
2025-07-10vs 3EAST-MONTE 50NW TH 18&O SEMSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Elena Strakhova vs Agata Szewczuk / Nynke van der Goot5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Smith / Robin Rogers vs Carla Jewell / Jessica Kruczek1-6, 1-6
2025-06-26vs 4OHCC-GYULAI 50NW TH 18&O SEMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Elena Strakhova vs Myrthe Molenveld / Maryna Kozachenko6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesKristina Lagoda vs Jessica Hill6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephanie Schulte / Ayano Nakamura vs Rachael Ebbing / Daria Haupt1-6, 1-6
2025-06-05vs 4OHCC-GYULAI 50NW TH 18&O SEMLost 03
L#1 DoublesAyumi Sasaki / Elena Strakhova vs Daria Haupt / Tia Mukherjee2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobin Rogers vs Eva Stevanovic1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTara Stover / Valentina Glover vs Monique Karoub / Ivona Gorgioski2-6, 5-7
2025-05-29vs 1CHIP-CLARK 50NW TH 18&O SEMLost 12
L#1 DoublesElena Strakhova / Ayumi Sasaki vs Libbey Rhegness / Catherine Rhegness6-7, 2-6
W#1 SinglesKristina Lagoda vs Meredith Moore6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRobin Rogers / Kelly Smith vs Camie Messick / Kendra Clark6-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 5.0 WOMEN THURS PM SEM
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
14OHCC-GYULAI 50NW TH 18&O SEM902439149
23EAST-MONTE 50NW TH 18&O SEM45121534255
32EAST-SASAKI 50NW TH 18&O SEM36111634246
41CHIP-CLARK 50NW TH 18&O SEM2772042288

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.88
Kristina Lagoda
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.77
Ayumi Sasaki
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published 5
Darylann Gulliver
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.38
Stephanie Schulte
usually #2 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.37
Ayano Nakamura
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.35
Valentina Glover
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Helaina Pietrowsky
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Elena Strakhova
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Lauren Vosicky
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Robin Rogers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Tara Stover
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elena Strakhova + Ayumi Sasaki7456% games−1.6% vs expected
Robin Rogers + Elena Strakhova2351% gamesnot enough data
Elena Strakhova + Darylann Gulliver224 matchesnot enough data
Ayumi Sasaki + Darylann Gulliver314 matchesnot enough data
Ayumi Sasaki + Stephanie Schulte123 matchesnot enough data
Tara Stover + Darylann Gulliver303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristina Lagoda
14W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.88
5
Ayumi Sasaki
71W–25L career · 8 lines in 2025
no projection at this level
4.77
5
Darylann Gulliver
47W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
4.5
Stephanie Schulte
103W–74L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Ayano Nakamura
286W–110L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
4.37
Valentina Glover
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
4.35
Helaina Pietrowsky
15W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
4.32
Elena Strakhova
61W–48L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lauren Vosicky
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Robin Rogers
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tara Stover
12W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.