Teams

Salt Lake Tennis-Wright

2023 Fall Indoor League-Saturday · 3.0W

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / UTAH

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-12-30vs Salt Lake Tennis-BickmoreWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesStephanie Favila / Nooshin Prasthofer vs Mariam Azin / April Woo2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2023-12-16vs Sports Mall-RoseLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLori Heimuli / Stephanie Favila vs Katie Rose / Diana Vogel3-6, 1-5
W#2 Female DoublesLauren Griswold / Hannah Galbreath vs Jamie Rossi / Melissa Barnett7-5, 6-1
2023-12-02vs Sports Mall-Farr/PetersonWon 10
W#3 Female DoublesAshley Wright / Hannah Galbreath vs Chelsea Spencer / Tori Locke6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-11-04vs Sports Mall-Lyon/GreenLost 01
L#3 Female DoublesLori Heimuli / Stephanie Favila vs Nancy Miller / Janine Piper1-6, 4-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Hannah Galbreath
usually #3 Female Doubles 50%, also #2 Female Doubles 50% · published 3
2.78
Gelyn Pauly
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Delia Bayna
usually #2 Female Doubles 57%, also #3 Female Doubles 43% · published 3
2.63
Ashley Wright
published 3
2.62
Lori Heimuli
published
2.62
Mariya Coleman
published
2.54
Stephanie Morris
published
2.25
Stephanie Favila
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lauren Griswold
published
Nooshin Prasthofer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Morris + Lauren Griswold6161% games−1.3% vs expected
Stephanie Favila + Stephanie Morris5358% gamesnot enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer + Maria von Ellm - McKenna224 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Morris + Lori Heimuli314 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Favila + Hannah Galbreath213 matchesnot enough data
Stephanie Morris + Hannah Galbreath303 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Wright + Maria von Ellm - McKenna123 matchesnot enough data
Hannah Galbreath + Lauren Griswold303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hannah Galbreath
29W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Gelyn Pauly
50W–93L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Delia Bayna
204W–265L career · 7 lines in 2023
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Ashley Wright
53W–112L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
2.63
Lori Heimuli
38W–48L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Mariya Coleman
14W–25L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
2.62
Stephanie Morris
53W–42L career · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
2.54
2.5
Stephanie Favila
47W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
0%96%4%
2.25
Lauren Griswold
25W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Maria von Ellm - McKenna
13W–22L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nooshin Prasthofer
98W–124L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.