Teams

KY/LOU/HAMILTON

2022 USTA LEAGUE 55 & Over ADULT LOUISVILLE · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Laurie Wood
published
2.78
Randi Means
published
Beverly Lewis
published 3
Donna Fisher
published 3
Emma Roach
published 3
2.61
Gayle Ciliberti
published 3
2.55
Jeanne Coffey
published
2.40
Lisa Marsh
published
Derynda Brooks
published
Janit Shannon
published
Judi Bigg
published
Kathy Lesmeister
published
Kris Hamilton
published
Peggy Athanasakes
published
Rachel Carlock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beverly Lewis + Donna Fisher6452% games−5.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laurie Wood
14W–10L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.13
Randi Means
17W–24L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Beverly Lewis
13W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Donna Fisher
7W–14L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Emma Roach
5W–11L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Gayle Ciliberti
26W–46L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
2.61
Jeanne Coffey
3W–11L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
2.55
Lisa Marsh
15W–38L career · no lines in 2022
79%21%<1%
2.40
Derynda Brooks
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Janit Shannon
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Judi Bigg
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Lesmeister
15W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kris Hamilton
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Peggy Athanasakes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Carlock
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.