Teams

Goebel/18/2.5/CM/QTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 2.5 Shrev

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 8 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 15 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 22 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Sep 29 7:30 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 6 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 13 6:00 PM
Querbes Tennis Center SPAR
Oct 20 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-09-01vs Campisi/18/2.5/CM/POTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesStephen Goebel / Benjamin Johnson vs Weber Hill / Nicolas Labarre3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Venden / Brett Venable vs Jay Mitchell / Vinay Kothapalli6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLeland Wilson / Michael Harvill vs David Campisi / Charlie Olivier2-6, 2-6
2026-08-25vs Sumner/18/2.5/CM/QTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesJacob Mccarty / Benjamin Johnson vs Justin Ketchum / John Davis0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesBrandon Anderson / Brett Venable vs Clinton Hutchinson / William Whited1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Harvill / Mario Parga vs Bill Sumner / Greg Green0-6, 2-6
2026-08-18vs Henry-Bennett/18/2.5/CM/CTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrandon Anderson / Brett Venable vs Damarcus Williams / Joshua Jefferson6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesStephen Goebel / Jeffrey Padgett vs Jamarcus Williams / Kevin Banks3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 2.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Henry-Bennett/18/2.5/CM/CTC1030115
2Wood/18/2.5/CM/BTC1030126
3Sumner/18/2.5/CM/QTC000000
4Estess/18/2.5/CM/BTC000000
5Goebel/18/2.5/CM/QTC0103634
6Campisi/18/2.5/CM/POTC0103638

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 1.98 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brandon Venden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.15
Brandon Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.05
Mario Parga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.99
Michael Harvill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.88
Stephen Goebel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
1.82
Jeffrey Padgett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jacob Mccarty
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Brandon Venden
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Brandon Anderson
2W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.15
Mario Parga
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.05
Michael Harvill
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.99
Stephen Goebel
5W–29L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.88
Jeffrey Padgett
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82
Jacob Mccarty
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.