Teams

Escambia/Wilson/18&Over6.0X

2025 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-05vs Vey - PCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSavannah Wilson / Ryan Sellars vs FRANK LOPRESTI / Marissa Couch6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMichelle Patterson / Clay Anderson vs Brittany Durrani / Jan Durrani6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeigh Diamond / Ethan Rhone vs Barksdale Jordan / ERIKA PHAN-LUNG6-1, 6-1
2025-07-29vs McElhany - PCCLost 01
L#1 DoublesJerry Clark / Kacee Bidnick vs Charlie Culpepper / Victoria Grise6-7, 3-6
2025-07-22vs Covington - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanice Clark / Jerry Clark vs Fletcher Wilson / Allee Blay-Digby6-4, 7-6
2025-07-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesJanice Clark / Jerry Clark vs Joshua Lewis / Lauren Smith6-3, 6-2
2025-07-08vs Worley - RS ClayWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacee Bidnick / Jerry Clark vs Reghan Robinson / Addison van Pelt6-3, 7-5
2025-07-02vs Escambia/Davis/18&Over6.0XWon 10
W#1 DoublesKacee Bidnick / Jerry Clark vs Xiaobo Dong / Bonnie Bucco6-2, 6-3
2025-06-24vs Ross - RS HardWon 21
L#1 DoublesLeigh Diamond / Ethan Rhone vs Amatul Bean / Collin Crowson0-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMargaret Menear / Nick Farkas vs Bradford Grimmel / Cheryl Vann6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSavannah Wilson / Ryan Sellars vs Brianna Ross / Arturo Ojeda Peraza6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Nick Farkas
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.19
Jerry Clark
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
3.15
Clay Anderson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Ethan Rhone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Ryan Sellars
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
published
2.61
Margaret Menear
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janice Clark
published
Katie Gross
published
Michelle Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Savannah Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tyler Gross
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.53
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Clay Anderson
32W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Margaret Menear
18W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Gross
4W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Patterson
2W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
6W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tyler Gross
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.