Teams

SGV Dare Doubles-Wang-WN/SA8

2023 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 4.5

11 players · average NTRP 4.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-10vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Won 10
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Cumbo / Claudia Vine vs Lorna Kim / Penapa Frick6-4, 6-1
2023-11-04vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Khin Aye vs Loretta Peng / Shanna Reznik0-6, 1-6
2023-10-28vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Won 10
W#3 DoublesSuzanne Cumbo / Claudia Vine vs Deann McCormick / Carrie Gan6-2, 6-3
2023-10-21vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Split 11
L#1 DoublesCara Hofstad / Ronalyn Raymundo vs Ami Belcher / Shanna Reznik1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Leslie Ho / Jessica Lee6-2, 6-3
2023-10-07vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Won 10
W#3 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Penapa Frick / Jessica Lee6-4, 6-2
2023-09-30vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Split 11
W#2 DoublesClaudia Vine / Suzanne Cumbo vs Kristina Chen / Loretta Peng7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCara Hofstad / Jasmine Dai vs Amanda Richardson / Gloria Geller3-6, 4-6
2023-09-23vs LLW SGV Ballers-Miller-Scholl/SA9Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCara Hofstad / Adrienne Beauvois vs Alison Harma / Debbie Sierra6-4, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.90 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.37
Cindy Shin
published 4.5
4.11
Claudia Vine
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.05
Jasmine Dai
published
3.99
Suzanne Cumbo
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.85
Wenli Chen
published
3.85
Adrienne Beauvois
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Jami Johnson
published
3.79
Cara Hofstad
usually #1 Doubles 69%, also #2 Doubles 15% · published 4
3.65
Judy Su
published
3.57
Khin Aye
published
Ronalyn Raymundo
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Claudia Vine + Suzanne Cumbo637946% games−3.2% vs expected
Adrienne Beauvois + Cara Hofstad13856% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cindy Shin
11W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
4.37
4.5
Claudia Vine
157W–138L career · 5 lines in 2023
22%77%<1%
4.11
Jasmine Dai
8W–5L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Suzanne Cumbo
105W–148L career · 5 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
3.99
Wenli Chen
5W–10L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
3.85
4
Adrienne Beauvois
152W–119L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%85%14%
3.85
Jami Johnson
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.80
4
Cara Hofstad
218W–155L career · 13 lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
Judy Su
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.65
Khin Aye
10W–16L career · no lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Ronalyn Raymundo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.