Teams

Bradshaw, Lynn

2026 Combo 55 & Over-JXN · Women 7.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-22vs Moseley, SallieWon 30
W#1 DoublesMelissa K Beach / Byron Edgecombe vs Clare Hanlon / Mary Sawardecker6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAngie DeLeon / Nancy Thompson vs Colleen Campbell / Sallie Moseley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDiane Barber / Lisa Tew vs Elisabeth Culbertson / Abba Mapp6-1, 6-3
2026-07-26vs Jones, LibbyLost 12
L#1 DoublesLori Williams / Melissa K Beach vs Deborah Norman / Kathy Rhodes4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLisa Tew / Emily Barnes vs Lila Gibbs / Suzanne Colbert6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDiane Barber / Susan Jackson vs Cindy Page / Leisa McCool4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Lauree Davis
published
3.60
Angie DeLeon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Melissa K Beach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Michele Rumbley
published
3.43
Diane Barber
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Byron Edgecombe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Meg Maulding
published
3.29
Lisa Tew
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.28
Sabrina Sutherland
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauree Davis + Melissa K Beach6162% games+23.3% vs expected
Diane Barber + Lisa Tew12458% games+5.5% vs expected
Michele Rumbley + Angie DeLeon8559% games+3.6% vs expected
Lauree Davis + Angie DeLeon4261% games−1.5% vs expected
Michele Rumbley + Melissa K Beach404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauree Davis
43W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.64
4
Angie DeLeon
18W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.60
Melissa K Beach
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
Michele Rumbley
23W–23L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
3.5
Diane Barber
18W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Byron Edgecombe
17W–6L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
Meg Maulding
23W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.36
Lisa Tew
23W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%2%98%
3.29
Sabrina Sutherland
15W–16L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.