Teams

SPTC Holliday 8.0 X

2025 Pinellas Mixed 18 & Over Spring · 8.0 MXD Sunday

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-06-29vs McMullen FramersWon 10
W#3 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Geoffrey Jones vs Amy Bodine / Andre Kashou6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-29vs Racquet Club RingersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJamyne Smith / NICHOLAS INNISS vs David Kenny / Sidney Wilson6-2, 6-2
2025-05-18vs Pinellas/Dsa/18&Over8.0MXDLost 01
L#2 DoublesNICHOLAS INNISS / Jamyne Smith vs Laura Hungiville / Andreas Waldthausen5-7, 3-6
2025-05-04vs McMullen RaytaliaLost 01
L#2 DoublesKenzier McIntyre / Shrey Mehta vs Laurie Smith / Monty Johnson4-6, 6-7
2025-04-19vs Seminole Lake Tough NutsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAntonio Williams / Kenzier McIntyre vs Caleb Hirsch / Alyssa Stine5-7, 4-6
2025-04-13vs Pinellas/Kronk/18&Over8.0MXDLost 02
L#1 DoublesGeoffrey Jones / Kenzier McIntyre vs Polina Dymochka / Joseph Tkac5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPeter Holtmann / Jamyne Smith vs Eric Mueller / SANDRA CARTER1-6, 5-7
2025-04-07vs McMullen FramersWon 10
W#1 DoublesNICHOLAS INNISS / Jamyne Smith vs Cambria Whalen / Colin Fitzgearl6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 MXD Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Geoffrey Jones
published 4.5
4.01
NICHOLAS INNISS
published
3.80
Eugene Holliday
published 4
3.80
Jamyne Smith
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Aja Sterling
published 4
3.55
Kenzier McIntyre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Jermaine Flowers
published
Lynn Henricks
published
Michael Rocke
published
Peter Holtmann
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Geoffrey Jones + Kenzier McIntyre2456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Geoffrey Jones
5W–11L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
NICHOLAS INNISS
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Eugene Holliday
7W–1L career · type M · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Jamyne Smith
35W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Aja Sterling
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Kenzier McIntyre
173W–119L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Jermaine Flowers
10W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lynn Henricks
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michael Rocke
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Peter Holtmann
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.