Teams

14 Westwood Harper

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.17 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-11-03vs 12 SCC Serve-vivors - WeisigerLost 01
L#1 SinglesChristine Albrecht vs Mary Knick2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-10-28vs 6 MRTC Northnuts - LeyWon 21
W#1 SinglesJordan Harper vs Xuemin Ginsberg7-6, 7-6
W#2 SinglesMeredith Schwartz vs Louise McCool2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 SinglesHeather DeBolt vs Kate Waller1-6, 1-6
2025-10-25vs 4 Southampton Roper 3.5Won 21
W#1 SinglesHayley Herrin vs Deena Kretzer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesLiza Joyner vs Pamela Hutzler6-2, 6-2
L#3 SinglesSarah Paladino-strater vs Lily VanElderen6-7, 3-6
2025-10-07vs 10 Woodlake Racquettes - PrestonWon 10
W#1 SinglesChristine Albrecht vs Kayla Bosman6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesChristine Albrecht vs Ashley Gromling6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Hayley Herrin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.43
Jordan Harper
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Christine Albrecht
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Liza Joyner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.20
Sarah Paladino-strater
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
3.13
Meredith Schwartz
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.93
Allison Rosen
published 3
2.83
Meriwether Arnett
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.82
Heather DeBolt
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.69
Catherine Stanley
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Lauren King
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hayley Herrin
26W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.51
Jordan Harper
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.43
3.5
Christine Albrecht
122W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
Liza Joyner
6W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Sarah Paladino-strater
18W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Meredith Schwartz
6W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
Allison Rosen
15W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
Meriwether Arnett
13W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Heather DeBolt
23W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Catherine Stanley
8W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69
Lauren King
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.