← Teams

MAC-Leedy (7.0)

2019 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 3.33 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Dalika Crawford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Janae Pyle
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.30
Jeffrey Bayless
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
—
Glenn Eisen
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.04
Catherine Leedy
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.00
Gretchen Wagner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.86
Matthew Casimo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Carol Robertson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
—
Alan Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Results8 ties
2018-11-10Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Dave Hall vs Holly Kanz / John Kin6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAlan Peters / Carol Robertson vs Joy Meyers / Tony Kalil6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Elizabeth Burns vs Colleen Walker / Henry Kofron7-6, 6-4
2018-11-04Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Robert Crawford vs Marianne Conroy / Benjamin Brewer6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJanae Pyle / Alan Peters vs Douglas Brewer / Julia Rea6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Matthew Casimo vs Arun Sundaram / Ann Skoog6-4, 6-2
2018-10-28Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Glenn Eisen vs Michelle Dombek / Gregg Palmer6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Jeffrey Bayless vs Vera Vos / Dan Wolff6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Robert Crawford vs Anh Pham / James Prouty5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2018-10-24Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Alan Peters vs Denise Dawkins / Mark Dawkins6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Jeffrey Bayless vs Jim Hamlik / Kim Hamlik4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Burns / Matthew Casimo vs Kelley Gaylor / Dean Gaylor6-2, 7-5
2018-10-13Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJeffrey Bayless / Gretchen Wagner vs Vimal Natarajan / Jian Xu6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Dave Hall vs Sara Shah / Jonathan Lo6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCarol Robertson / Alan Peters vs Aleli Siruno / Craig Walker6-0, 6-4
2018-10-07Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesDalika Crawford / Bruce Landrey vs Angie Lee / John Yu6-2, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCarol Robertson / Jeffrey Bayless vs Angelina Warriner / Dan Boren6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJanae Pyle / Robert Crawford vs Vivian Nguyen / Craig Putnam6-0, 6-2
2018-09-16Won 2–1
L#1 DoublesStephanie Jones / Jeffrey Bayless vs Brooke Henderson / Rolf Ellingsen6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKristin Eckelman / Glenn Eisen vs Cheryl Geisler / Jon Peters - *3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGretchen Wagner / Matthew Casimo vs Tamara Phillips / David Smiley6-4, 6-3
2018-09-14Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJanae Pyle / Glenn Eisen vs Tara Delarosa / Jim Nudelman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCatherine Leedy / Dave Hall vs Adriana Caliri / Thor Deacon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Jones / Jeffrey Bayless vs Naomi Steinberg / Alex Delarosa6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Dalika Crawford
60W–40L career
0%89%11%
3.45
3.5
Janae Pyle
98W–49L career
0%95%5%
3.39
3.5
Jeffrey Bayless
130W–100L career
0%99%1%
3.30
3.5
Glenn Eisen
57W–50L career
not enough data
—
3.5
Catherine Leedy
86W–119L career
23%77%0%
3.04
3.5
Gretchen Wagner
40W–54L career
35%65%0%
3.00
3
Matthew Casimo
40W–103L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Carol Robertson
15W–33L career
2%96%1%
2.76
3
Alan Peters
2W–21L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.