Teams

Tomlinson-NC-Southaven

2025 Adult 40&Over-NC · Women 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.88 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-05-15vs Miller - NC - TunicaLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Hehir / Cynthia Coleman vs Pam Miller / Lori Gibbons6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTammy Robertson / Christine Ohrberg vs Kristi Cherry / Amy Mullens6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTerra Bowling / Roni Terry vs Brittany Crain / Cynthia Bigham4-6, 4-6
2025-04-07vs Miller - NC - TunicaWon 31
W#1 DoublesKaren Hehir / Cynthia Coleman vs Pam Miller / Lindsey Sandifer4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesWENDY Vines vs Cynthia Bigham6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRachel Burford / Christine Ohrberg vs Celeste Wilson / Rebecca Mitchell6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimberly Williams / Roni Terry vs Tiffany Gililland / Amy Mullens7-5, 0-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.48 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.75
Brandi Tomlinson
published 3
2.71
Diana Roedel
published 3
2.57
Rachel Burford
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.55
Christine Ohrberg
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.50
Roni Terry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.49
Karen Hehir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Susan Patrone
published
2.42
WENDY Vines
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.38
Marin Touchstone
published
2.33
Terra Bowling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Amelia Blanton
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diana Roedel + Rachel Burford4353% games+2.5% vs expected
Terra Bowling + Christine Ohrberg123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brandi Tomlinson
23W–35L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.75
3
Diana Roedel
18W–32L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Rachel Burford
26W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
0%31%69%
2.57
3
Christine Ohrberg
18W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Roni Terry
35W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%51%49%
2.50
Karen Hehir
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
Susan Patrone
18W–31L career · no lines in 2025
0%65%35%
2.44
WENDY Vines
29W–44L career · 1 line in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Marin Touchstone
6W–21L career · no lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Terra Bowling
10W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Amelia Blanton
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.